This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms Low‑importance This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anglo-Saxon KingdomsWikipedia:WikiProject Anglo-Saxon KingdomsTemplate:WikiProject Anglo-Saxon KingdomsAnglo-Saxon Kingdoms articles Low This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Languages Low‑importance This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles Low This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

See previous discussions at Talk:Old English declension.

A big thank you to those who have expanded this article. I seem to recall when I opened it that it was challenged as not being notable. Others have now done the work to document a considerable quantity of information that is valuable indeed, and sits best at an entry with this title. This is great co-operative encyclopedia making. Heartfelt thanks to all on behalf of future readers of this entry. Cheers Alastair Haines ( talk) 00:48, 28 April 2008 (UTC) reply

'IC' should not redirect here. The disambig page would be fine. 151.185.60.250 ( talk) 13:39, 14 September 2008 (UTC) reply

How can this bloody thing be edited? "Ic" should be pronounced with tʃ, not ç (see here), but there's no way I can access the section in a usual way 89.231.123.40 ( talk) 23:36, 13 July 2010 (UTC) reply