Old Blockhouse has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: April 4, 2014. ( Reviewed version).

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: Fortifications / British / European This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles Associated task forces: /  Fortifications task force British military history task force European military history task force Cornwall Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cornwall, an attempt to improve and expand Wikipedia coverage of Cornwall and all things Cornish. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project member page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.CornwallWikipedia:WikiProject CornwallTemplate:WikiProject CornwallCornwall-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. See drop-down box for suggested article edit guidelines: Be bold - if you know something about Cornwall then put it in! We value your contributions and don't be afraid if your spelling isn't great as there are plenty of spelling and grammar experts on clean-up duty! Articles on settlements in Cornwall should be written using the standard set of headings approved by the UK geography WikiProject's guideline How to write about settlements. At WikiProject Cornwall we subscribe to the policies laid down by Wikipedia - particularly civility and consensus building. We are aware that the wording on Cornish entries can sometimes be a contentious topic, especially those concerning geography. You don't have to agree with everything but there is no excuse for rudeness and these things are best solved through consensus building and compromise. For more information see WP:CornwallGuideline. These pages are not platforms for political discussion. Issues relating to Cornish politics should be restricted to those pages that directly deal with these issues (such as Constitutional status of Cornwall, Cornish nationalism, etc) and should not overflow into other articles. Most of all have fun editing - that's the reason we all do this, right?!

This review is transcluded from Talk:Old Blockhouse/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Zawed ( talk · contribs) 08:25, 28 March 2014 (UTC) reply

I'll take this one since I enjoyed the Cow Tower article so much...will add comments over the weekend. Zawed ( talk) 08:25, 28 March 2014 (UTC) reply

Comments as follows:

16th century

• I wonder if some context for Francis Flemming (and possibly John Killigrew and William Tyrell) is needed. Was Flemming a military engineer?

17th century

• Interregnum, Royalists and Robert Blake not linked in this section. All are linked in the lead.
• "Tresco became a base for Royalist privateers and Parliament became concerned that the Dutch": repeated use of "became".

18th-21st centuries

• link Duchy of Cornwall, Duke of Marlborough

Other stuff

• No duplicate links.
• Image tags look good.
• No dab links.
• External links work OK.

Pretty good work. Minor quibbles only. Zawed ( talk) 02:46, 30 March 2014 (UTC) reply

• Thanks Zawed! I'll make the changes on Thursday night. Hchc2009 ( talk) 17:11, 31 March 2014 (UTC) reply

Should be all done. I couldn't find any more on Tyrell, unfortunately. Thanks for the review! Hchc2009 ( talk) 16:39, 3 April 2014 (UTC) reply

Shame about Tyrell, but I think the context is better now for Flemming and Killigrew. Looks good, so am passing as GA. A pleasure to review. Cheers. Zawed ( talk) 21:56, 4 April 2014 (UTC) reply