The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
(a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with
the layout style guideline
(b)
reliable sources are
cited inline. All content that
could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose)
"Intro" In the second paragraph of the intro, it states that the volcano has not erupted in the past 10,000 years, but in the infobox it further details that it has not erupted in the past 25,000 years. Shouldn't the 10,000 statement be rewritten to correlate with this, or is there a specific reason why 10,000 is mentioned; i.e., a significance pertaining to a minimum of 10,000 years of inactivity?
We Wikipedians only take NO for an answer! (
talk)
04:20, 7 February 2019 (UTC)reply
Wilhelmina Will - in eruptive history it's just clarifying that it's no younger than 11,000 years old. I realize now that this is redundant after saying it's at least 25,000 years old, so I just cut that part out entirely. ceranthor18:14, 11 February 2019 (UTC)reply
"Human history" In the intro, it states that the Forest Service fire lookout tower was the building that was abandoned and had its roof collapse in, but in this section, it seems to imply that it was another building that this happened to, instead. Unless, of course, the cupola cabin was an extension to the lookout tower?
We Wikipedians only take NO for an answer! (
talk)
13:25, 11 February 2019 (UTC)reply
Sorry for that error. I think it was a remnant of the original version of this article when I started revamping it. Changed to "A
Forest Servicefire lookout tower was built on the summit in 1915 but abandoned in 1967; the summit also had a
cupola cabin from 1920 until its roof collapsed in 1982." What do you think of that version? ceranthor18:14, 11 February 2019 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
(a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with
the layout style guideline
(b)
reliable sources are
cited inline. All content that
could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose)
"Intro" In the second paragraph of the intro, it states that the volcano has not erupted in the past 10,000 years, but in the infobox it further details that it has not erupted in the past 25,000 years. Shouldn't the 10,000 statement be rewritten to correlate with this, or is there a specific reason why 10,000 is mentioned; i.e., a significance pertaining to a minimum of 10,000 years of inactivity?
We Wikipedians only take NO for an answer! (
talk)
04:20, 7 February 2019 (UTC)reply
Wilhelmina Will - in eruptive history it's just clarifying that it's no younger than 11,000 years old. I realize now that this is redundant after saying it's at least 25,000 years old, so I just cut that part out entirely. ceranthor18:14, 11 February 2019 (UTC)reply
"Human history" In the intro, it states that the Forest Service fire lookout tower was the building that was abandoned and had its roof collapse in, but in this section, it seems to imply that it was another building that this happened to, instead. Unless, of course, the cupola cabin was an extension to the lookout tower?
We Wikipedians only take NO for an answer! (
talk)
13:25, 11 February 2019 (UTC)reply
Sorry for that error. I think it was a remnant of the original version of this article when I started revamping it. Changed to "A
Forest Servicefire lookout tower was built on the summit in 1915 but abandoned in 1967; the summit also had a
cupola cabin from 1920 until its roof collapsed in 1982." What do you think of that version? ceranthor18:14, 11 February 2019 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.