From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleOklahoma State Highway 30 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 27, 2013 Good article nomineeListed

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Oklahoma State Highway 30/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: TCN7JM ( talk · contribs) 12:22, 26 September 2013 (UTC) reply

I will review this later today. T C N7JM 12:22, 26 September 2013 (UTC) reply

I have made a couple of tweaks myself, but otherwise only have three minor nitpicks.

  1. Using "the current incarnation" in the lead implies that this is the most recent and that there were more than one, which doesn't seem to be the case.
  2. Maybe explain that the northern terminus of the highway in Durham is at an unnumbered road in the RD.
  3. Inconsistency in the RJL, destinations column reads "I-40 Bus.", but notes column reads "I-40 BUS".

I will put this on hold until these are addressed. T C N7JM 12:40, 26 September 2013 (UTC) reply

All concerns should now be addressed. — Scott5114 [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 22:32, 27 September 2013 (UTC) reply
Great. I will pass the article now. T C N7JM 23:05, 27 September 2013 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleOklahoma State Highway 30 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 27, 2013 Good article nomineeListed

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Oklahoma State Highway 30/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: TCN7JM ( talk · contribs) 12:22, 26 September 2013 (UTC) reply

I will review this later today. T C N7JM 12:22, 26 September 2013 (UTC) reply

I have made a couple of tweaks myself, but otherwise only have three minor nitpicks.

  1. Using "the current incarnation" in the lead implies that this is the most recent and that there were more than one, which doesn't seem to be the case.
  2. Maybe explain that the northern terminus of the highway in Durham is at an unnumbered road in the RD.
  3. Inconsistency in the RJL, destinations column reads "I-40 Bus.", but notes column reads "I-40 BUS".

I will put this on hold until these are addressed. T C N7JM 12:40, 26 September 2013 (UTC) reply

All concerns should now be addressed. — Scott5114 [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 22:32, 27 September 2013 (UTC) reply
Great. I will pass the article now. T C N7JM 23:05, 27 September 2013 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook