![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Oil Megaprojects Task Force |
The article page to this talk page, is subject to revision by the Oil Megaprojects Task Force. |
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 8 sections are present. |
Koshk Hosseineh has been deleted from year 2010 since it is the same as Yadavaran, year 2011
http://www.upstreamonline.com/live/article8223.ece?service=print
Hydro eyes Yadavaran
Norway's Norsk Hydro said today that it is bidding to take part in the development of Iran's giant Yadavaran oilfield. "We have put in a bid for Yadavaran," Norsk Hydro senior vice president Jorgen Kristian Andersen told Reuters on the sidelines of its third-quarter earnings presentation in Oslo.
He said the company was also seeking a licence north of its Anaran block in Iran, where it has a 75% stake.
Yadavaran, formerly known as Kushk and Hosseinieh, lies close to the Anaran block in Iran's south-west.
In July, Iran said that it had made new discoveries in several crude layers at Yadavaran that amounted to more than 3 billion barrels of recoverable crude.
Fellow Norwegian outfit Statoil has also bid for participation in Yadavaran.
14:54 GMT, 18 October 2004 | last updated: 09:39 GMT, 28 April 2005
see here : Tempa Rossa Done, Tony
I have found this term at other articles and even other websites. It seems Wikipedia is being used to publish original research. This cannot be the case. Wikipedia is only for displaying existing research published elsewhere by reliable sources. We can also not reference Wikipedia as a reference in other articles. Any concepts discussed here must be established firmly elsewhere first.
I'm going to look around my self a bit, but if I or no one else can find good references for the prediction section in this article, it will have to go. NJGW ( talk) 16:37, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
It would be nice to run the script to update the table plz:) -- Raminagrobis fr ( talk) 20:54, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
Obviously this article has no value if not maintained regularly. I suggest to include a note in the beginning stating the tables are out of date.
I find it quite strange that a WP article can be maintained by a single person : this is totally contrary to WP principles, including open source.
If the person in charge of maintainance ever turns up again, please note that Indonesia is no longer OPEC, and make sure to correct the table accordingly. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Environnement2100 ( talk • contribs) 22:35, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
I miss all the develloppement of existing oilfields in IRAK by foreign companies like ESSO TOTAl and others with they say ten millions barrels of new production expected in the next 10 years. Why is this production not included in “Wikipedia oil megaproject”?
Rodolphe —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.80.224.83 ( talk) 20:29, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
In an article published at http://www.energybulletin.net/node/52020 on March 17, 2010, Tom Whipple wrote "new oil fields coming into production which for 2009 and 2010 is expected to add about 6 million b/d of new productive capacity each year." That is a considerably higher estimate for total new oil production for those years than is listed in the Oil megaprojects database. How can those estimates be reconciled? Jkintree ( talk) 03:27, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
Is this a joke? How is 20,000 barrels called a megaproject? The world produces about 89 million barrels of oil a day. 20,000 is about 2% of that. Miniprojects would be a better title. Delphi234 ( talk) 05:40, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Oil Megaprojects Task Force |
The article page to this talk page, is subject to revision by the Oil Megaprojects Task Force. |
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 8 sections are present. |
Koshk Hosseineh has been deleted from year 2010 since it is the same as Yadavaran, year 2011
http://www.upstreamonline.com/live/article8223.ece?service=print
Hydro eyes Yadavaran
Norway's Norsk Hydro said today that it is bidding to take part in the development of Iran's giant Yadavaran oilfield. "We have put in a bid for Yadavaran," Norsk Hydro senior vice president Jorgen Kristian Andersen told Reuters on the sidelines of its third-quarter earnings presentation in Oslo.
He said the company was also seeking a licence north of its Anaran block in Iran, where it has a 75% stake.
Yadavaran, formerly known as Kushk and Hosseinieh, lies close to the Anaran block in Iran's south-west.
In July, Iran said that it had made new discoveries in several crude layers at Yadavaran that amounted to more than 3 billion barrels of recoverable crude.
Fellow Norwegian outfit Statoil has also bid for participation in Yadavaran.
14:54 GMT, 18 October 2004 | last updated: 09:39 GMT, 28 April 2005
see here : Tempa Rossa Done, Tony
I have found this term at other articles and even other websites. It seems Wikipedia is being used to publish original research. This cannot be the case. Wikipedia is only for displaying existing research published elsewhere by reliable sources. We can also not reference Wikipedia as a reference in other articles. Any concepts discussed here must be established firmly elsewhere first.
I'm going to look around my self a bit, but if I or no one else can find good references for the prediction section in this article, it will have to go. NJGW ( talk) 16:37, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
It would be nice to run the script to update the table plz:) -- Raminagrobis fr ( talk) 20:54, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
Obviously this article has no value if not maintained regularly. I suggest to include a note in the beginning stating the tables are out of date.
I find it quite strange that a WP article can be maintained by a single person : this is totally contrary to WP principles, including open source.
If the person in charge of maintainance ever turns up again, please note that Indonesia is no longer OPEC, and make sure to correct the table accordingly. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Environnement2100 ( talk • contribs) 22:35, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
I miss all the develloppement of existing oilfields in IRAK by foreign companies like ESSO TOTAl and others with they say ten millions barrels of new production expected in the next 10 years. Why is this production not included in “Wikipedia oil megaproject”?
Rodolphe —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.80.224.83 ( talk) 20:29, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
In an article published at http://www.energybulletin.net/node/52020 on March 17, 2010, Tom Whipple wrote "new oil fields coming into production which for 2009 and 2010 is expected to add about 6 million b/d of new productive capacity each year." That is a considerably higher estimate for total new oil production for those years than is listed in the Oil megaprojects database. How can those estimates be reconciled? Jkintree ( talk) 03:27, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
Is this a joke? How is 20,000 barrels called a megaproject? The world produces about 89 million barrels of oil a day. 20,000 is about 2% of that. Miniprojects would be a better title. Delphi234 ( talk) 05:40, 18 June 2012 (UTC)