Ohio State Route 167 has been listed as one of the
Engineering and technology good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: January 14, 2014. ( Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Newyorkadam ( talk · contribs) 19:07, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
I'll take this. I'll start it tomorrow.
Quick-glance comments:
- Newyorkadam ( talk) 21:19, 13 January 2014 (UTC)Newyorkadam
Comments:
Everything else looks good! I'll do the table once you go over my comments :) - Newyorkadam ( talk) 20:28, 14 January 2014 (UTC)Newyorkadam
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | After edits, yes :) | |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | ||
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | ||
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | ||
2c. it contains no original research. | ||
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | ||
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | ||
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | ||
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | Only recent edits are by User:CycloneIsaac (the nominator). No edit wars. | |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | The Ohio State Route sign is in the public domain, the map is user-made, and the picture of the route is from Flickr, under the license 'Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic' which is allowed on WIkipedia! | |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | ||
7. Overall assessment. | Congrats :D |
Final decision comment:
Passed! Nice article :) Looking forward to reviewing many more! - Newyorkadam ( talk) 23:10, 14 January 2014 (UTC)Newyorkadam
Ohio State Route 167 has been listed as one of the
Engineering and technology good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: January 14, 2014. ( Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Newyorkadam ( talk · contribs) 19:07, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
I'll take this. I'll start it tomorrow.
Quick-glance comments:
- Newyorkadam ( talk) 21:19, 13 January 2014 (UTC)Newyorkadam
Comments:
Everything else looks good! I'll do the table once you go over my comments :) - Newyorkadam ( talk) 20:28, 14 January 2014 (UTC)Newyorkadam
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | After edits, yes :) | |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | ||
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | ||
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | ||
2c. it contains no original research. | ||
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | ||
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | ||
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | ||
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | Only recent edits are by User:CycloneIsaac (the nominator). No edit wars. | |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | The Ohio State Route sign is in the public domain, the map is user-made, and the picture of the route is from Flickr, under the license 'Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic' which is allowed on WIkipedia! | |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | ||
7. Overall assessment. | Congrats :D |
Final decision comment:
Passed! Nice article :) Looking forward to reviewing many more! - Newyorkadam ( talk) 23:10, 14 January 2014 (UTC)Newyorkadam