 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
prod, no references at all, does not assert notability, circulation, importance, verifiability..etc etc. A lot of his books are of note i even own them, but this one might not be, in any case the article doesn't make the case for its inclusion here —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.1.91.172 ( talk • contribs)
-
Al Franken is a well-known author; this book is almost certain to be notable. E.g.,
here's a NYT review. Not prod material. You could take it to AfD, but I don't recommend it as it will likely just be a speedy keep.
Jfire (
talk)
06:25, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
- i started the article because most (if not all) of franken's books have articles. you're more than welcome to add to it and beef it up, but it is a valid article —Preceding unsigned comment added by Spookyadler ( talk • contribs) 14:43, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
|
| This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
prod, no references at all, does not assert notability, circulation, importance, verifiability..etc etc. A lot of his books are of note i even own them, but this one might not be, in any case the article doesn't make the case for its inclusion here —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.1.91.172 ( talk • contribs)
-
Al Franken is a well-known author; this book is almost certain to be notable. E.g.,
here's a NYT review. Not prod material. You could take it to AfD, but I don't recommend it as it will likely just be a speedy keep.
Jfire (
talk)
06:25, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
- i started the article because most (if not all) of franken's books have articles. you're more than welcome to add to it and beef it up, but it is a valid article —Preceding unsigned comment added by Spookyadler ( talk • contribs) 14:43, 12 March 2008 (UTC)