 | This article was nominated for deletion on 13 October 2008 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
OK--so was any decision reached on the AfD, which suggested that the book be merged into the author's article? See Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Mark_W._Smith. Drmies ( talk) 14:24, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
- Both articles are still here and the discussion to delete the author's page is in archive. So this 'Discussion Page' is going on two years obsolete. New to the topic, I would suggest this thread also be archived.
Charles Edwin Shipp (
talk)
22:00, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
- Further, even though Mark W. Smith seems famous and notable, I suggest that his book is even more notable and famous. Talk about merging Mr. Smith into this article, not the other way around (but neither will happen) .!.
Charles Edwin Shipp (
talk)
22:05, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
- Still here. Charles Edwin Shipp ( talk) 02:54, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
- Further, even though Mark W. Smith seems famous and notable, I suggest that his book is even more notable and famous. Talk about merging Mr. Smith into this article, not the other way around (but neither will happen) .!.
Charles Edwin Shipp (
talk)
22:05, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
|
| This article was nominated for deletion on 13 October 2008 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
|
| This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
OK--so was any decision reached on the AfD, which suggested that the book be merged into the author's article? See Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Mark_W._Smith. Drmies ( talk) 14:24, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
- Both articles are still here and the discussion to delete the author's page is in archive. So this 'Discussion Page' is going on two years obsolete. New to the topic, I would suggest this thread also be archived.
Charles Edwin Shipp (
talk)
22:00, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
- Further, even though Mark W. Smith seems famous and notable, I suggest that his book is even more notable and famous. Talk about merging Mr. Smith into this article, not the other way around (but neither will happen) .!.
Charles Edwin Shipp (
talk)
22:05, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
- Still here. Charles Edwin Shipp ( talk) 02:54, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
- Further, even though Mark W. Smith seems famous and notable, I suggest that his book is even more notable and famous. Talk about merging Mr. Smith into this article, not the other way around (but neither will happen) .!.
Charles Edwin Shipp (
talk)
22:05, 30 August 2010 (UTC)