![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Anybody know the background of the "Specially Designated Global Terrorist" designation? TIA.
The "specially designated nationals list" link links back to the same article. I wouldn't like to remove it as I'd like to see a full article, but I don't know anything about it (which is in a sense why I'd like to see the article!)
Unsigned —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.106.90.9 ( talk) 02:36, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
This seems like an important fact to include:
Pnm ( talk) 01:47, 30 May 2010 (UTC) Dear @ Pnm:Dead link. But see the book. [1] Geraldshields11 ( talk) 00:27, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
I think it’s important to show the financial industry several places to get a compliance certificate or simple OFAC search. -- EditUniv1 ( talk) 00:20, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
A minor point, but I don't know if the history of the office should speak of retaliation for "the harassment of American sailors" - I know that's taken from the official website, but I don't think a US government entity could be considered NPOV with regards to the war of 1812. I imagine others (eg. British) might dispute claims of harassment, or even claims that they were American sailors, not to mention the reasons for the sanctions. - Matthew238 ( talk) 10:53, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
The numbers may not reflect the fact that the list contains an entry for every alias, meaning some people or companies have a dozen or more entries.
All the best:
Rich
Farmbrough,
15:51, 9 October 2015 (UTC).
Good work!
Here is an example of alias listing, from near the top:
ABAROA PRECIADO, Aristoteles (a.k.a. ABAROA PRECIADO, Aristoteles
Alejandro), La Paz, Baja California Sur, Mexico; DOB 29 Sep 1981;
POB La Paz, Baja California Sur, Mexico; nationality Mexico;
citizen Mexico; C.U.R.P. AAPA810929HBSBRR19 (Mexico) (individual)
[SDNTK].
ABAROA PRECIADO, Aristoteles Alejandro (a.k.a. ABAROA PRECIADO,
Aristoteles), La Paz, Baja California Sur, Mexico; DOB 29 Sep 1981;
POB La Paz, Baja California Sur, Mexico; nationality Mexico;
citizen Mexico; C.U.R.P. AAPA810929HBSBRR19 (Mexico) (individual)
[SDNTK].
Unfortunately this file is not trivial to process (though not very hard either).
All the best:
Rich
Farmbrough,
16:52, 9 October 2015 (UTC).
@ Rich Farmbrough: It's nice to have someone with whom to collaborate with on a page. I appreciate your help. Thanks.
— Boruch Baum ( talk) 03:12, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
My curiosity was piqued by reports of a "terror granny" described as "most wanted female terrorist" by the sensationalist press, and further by a statement that there are very few (implication was one) US citizens on the SDGT list. So breaking down the numbers by nationality and program is of interest.
On the list itself, as the article remarks it is being used as a policy lever, and a revenue raiser: The Federal courts have warned about the unconstitutionality of the way it has been used. It is part of the raft of poorly-thought out legislation implemented post 9-11, which, however has its uses.
As to the processing, the non-orgs are tagged "(vessel)" and so on, so I first split into 4 files. Then I created a list of aliases, line by line. For each line which has "n" aliases either there are zero matches, n matches or somewhere between. If the original database is perfect, and no-one shares an alias we should either be looking at a new person (0 matches) or someone we have already processed (n matches). That is the lines grouped by person should form a partition (mathematics) of the set. Anyone in between needs investigation. (Note the algorithm isn't perfect, if all of someone's aliases are shared across several other people, then they will seem OK. I think we can ignore that, but I may recode.)
I'll email you the current code when I get in this evening.
All the best:
Rich
Farmbrough,
11:53, 11 October 2015 (UTC).
@ Rich Farmbrough: OK, so we agree its desirable to present numbers for each nationality and each program.
Regards. — Boruch Baum ( talk) 14:21, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
@ Rich Farmbrough: Oops. My argument about "number of entries" (burden of compliance) is totally and embarrassingly wrong: 1) the list is sorted alphabetically; 2) there's no burden in asking your computer to search for a character string. OTOH, from googling the subject, there seems to be big bucks to be made by lawyers and contractors offering services guaranteeing compliance with the sanctions. — Boruch Baum ( talk) 14:50, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Office of Foreign Assets Control. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 02:06, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
I have this government office listed on my bank paper work if yet to receive anything I'm a clear gene match for about 20 years and I recieved beneficiary email 5 or more years ago. and made claims curious how long this process takes!? AKARKANDY123 ( talk) 16:16, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Anybody know the background of the "Specially Designated Global Terrorist" designation? TIA.
The "specially designated nationals list" link links back to the same article. I wouldn't like to remove it as I'd like to see a full article, but I don't know anything about it (which is in a sense why I'd like to see the article!)
Unsigned —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.106.90.9 ( talk) 02:36, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
This seems like an important fact to include:
Pnm ( talk) 01:47, 30 May 2010 (UTC) Dear @ Pnm:Dead link. But see the book. [1] Geraldshields11 ( talk) 00:27, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
I think it’s important to show the financial industry several places to get a compliance certificate or simple OFAC search. -- EditUniv1 ( talk) 00:20, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
A minor point, but I don't know if the history of the office should speak of retaliation for "the harassment of American sailors" - I know that's taken from the official website, but I don't think a US government entity could be considered NPOV with regards to the war of 1812. I imagine others (eg. British) might dispute claims of harassment, or even claims that they were American sailors, not to mention the reasons for the sanctions. - Matthew238 ( talk) 10:53, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
The numbers may not reflect the fact that the list contains an entry for every alias, meaning some people or companies have a dozen or more entries.
All the best:
Rich
Farmbrough,
15:51, 9 October 2015 (UTC).
Good work!
Here is an example of alias listing, from near the top:
ABAROA PRECIADO, Aristoteles (a.k.a. ABAROA PRECIADO, Aristoteles
Alejandro), La Paz, Baja California Sur, Mexico; DOB 29 Sep 1981;
POB La Paz, Baja California Sur, Mexico; nationality Mexico;
citizen Mexico; C.U.R.P. AAPA810929HBSBRR19 (Mexico) (individual)
[SDNTK].
ABAROA PRECIADO, Aristoteles Alejandro (a.k.a. ABAROA PRECIADO,
Aristoteles), La Paz, Baja California Sur, Mexico; DOB 29 Sep 1981;
POB La Paz, Baja California Sur, Mexico; nationality Mexico;
citizen Mexico; C.U.R.P. AAPA810929HBSBRR19 (Mexico) (individual)
[SDNTK].
Unfortunately this file is not trivial to process (though not very hard either).
All the best:
Rich
Farmbrough,
16:52, 9 October 2015 (UTC).
@ Rich Farmbrough: It's nice to have someone with whom to collaborate with on a page. I appreciate your help. Thanks.
— Boruch Baum ( talk) 03:12, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
My curiosity was piqued by reports of a "terror granny" described as "most wanted female terrorist" by the sensationalist press, and further by a statement that there are very few (implication was one) US citizens on the SDGT list. So breaking down the numbers by nationality and program is of interest.
On the list itself, as the article remarks it is being used as a policy lever, and a revenue raiser: The Federal courts have warned about the unconstitutionality of the way it has been used. It is part of the raft of poorly-thought out legislation implemented post 9-11, which, however has its uses.
As to the processing, the non-orgs are tagged "(vessel)" and so on, so I first split into 4 files. Then I created a list of aliases, line by line. For each line which has "n" aliases either there are zero matches, n matches or somewhere between. If the original database is perfect, and no-one shares an alias we should either be looking at a new person (0 matches) or someone we have already processed (n matches). That is the lines grouped by person should form a partition (mathematics) of the set. Anyone in between needs investigation. (Note the algorithm isn't perfect, if all of someone's aliases are shared across several other people, then they will seem OK. I think we can ignore that, but I may recode.)
I'll email you the current code when I get in this evening.
All the best:
Rich
Farmbrough,
11:53, 11 October 2015 (UTC).
@ Rich Farmbrough: OK, so we agree its desirable to present numbers for each nationality and each program.
Regards. — Boruch Baum ( talk) 14:21, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
@ Rich Farmbrough: Oops. My argument about "number of entries" (burden of compliance) is totally and embarrassingly wrong: 1) the list is sorted alphabetically; 2) there's no burden in asking your computer to search for a character string. OTOH, from googling the subject, there seems to be big bucks to be made by lawyers and contractors offering services guaranteeing compliance with the sanctions. — Boruch Baum ( talk) 14:50, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Office of Foreign Assets Control. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 02:06, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
I have this government office listed on my bank paper work if yet to receive anything I'm a clear gene match for about 20 years and I recieved beneficiary email 5 or more years ago. and made claims curious how long this process takes!? AKARKANDY123 ( talk) 16:16, 29 June 2021 (UTC)