The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Dylnuge ( talk · contribs) 02:09, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
Hey
Epicgenius (
talk ·
contribs), I am picking this up as part of Vati's peer pressure campaign on Discord the GAN backlog drive. I'll leave comments as I review (including an initial assessment shortly) and ping when I'm finished; feel free to respond as I leave comments or wait until the end, whatever works best for you. Let me know if you have any questions or concerns and please don't hesitate to call out any mistakes I make. Thanks!
Dylnuge (
Talk •
Edits)
02:09, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
Good Article review progress box
|
Initial comments: Article is stable. References exist, meet style guidelines, and statements are all clearly cited. Earwig detects no copyvio. Images exist, are properly licensed, and are appropriately captioned (I believe there is no need to caption the one in the infobox). No cleanup tags or issues that would merit them. From my initial read, prose appears to be well-written, coverage appears to be both comprehensive and focused, and there are no apparent neutrality issues. Everything looks really good! Dylnuge ( Talk • Edits) 02:48, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
Comments
This was a really excellent article! This stuff above is all I'm seeing and none of it is a problem for GA, so I'm marking prose, broadness/focus, and neutrality as passes. Feel free to reply to these comments if you want; I should be back around to do the source verification in a few hours. Dylnuge ( Talk • Edits) 22:48, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Source checking
Brooklyn was granted its city charter in 1834 and during the years that followed a residential neighborhood formed in the area close to the proposed site of the city hall that was once part of the Duffield estate.Book source includes additional paragraphs about the estate.
...[they] were rewarded by an immense increase in trade. To such an extent was this the case that they found it necessary to acquire still further space to accommodate their constantly growing business. From the Landmarks Preservation Committee report:
the 87-by-100-foot annex was completed during Fall 1893.
a figure close to $1,000,000and mentions the acquisition of the adjacent 3-story building at 237 Duffield.
The new store will mark Nordstrom's first foray into Brooklynand confirms the square footage and second floor. The Brownstoner article ( [6]) is I think just to confirm the announcement proceeded the H&M one, as it doesn't really say much, though it also says
our guess is that the retailer is headed for 505 Fulton Street, so I'm not even sure it says that much. Personally I'd drop it as a source and just say "Around the same time the H&M store opened", but this is also fine as-is.
Status
Everything looks really good! Sourcing is generally solid; see the one cross above (and also the last note). I don't have much else, this article contains very good information. Everything is well presented, sourcing is excellent, organization is excellent, nothing is missing. Honestly I don't think any of my comments are holding this back from GA but I'll put this on hold to give you a chance to review and incorporate them if you want, otherwise let me know and I am happy to list it! Dylnuge ( Talk • Edits) 04:29, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
Passed — All GA criteria are met and all issues found have been fixed. Listing.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Dylnuge ( talk · contribs) 02:09, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
Hey
Epicgenius (
talk ·
contribs), I am picking this up as part of Vati's peer pressure campaign on Discord the GAN backlog drive. I'll leave comments as I review (including an initial assessment shortly) and ping when I'm finished; feel free to respond as I leave comments or wait until the end, whatever works best for you. Let me know if you have any questions or concerns and please don't hesitate to call out any mistakes I make. Thanks!
Dylnuge (
Talk •
Edits)
02:09, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
Good Article review progress box
|
Initial comments: Article is stable. References exist, meet style guidelines, and statements are all clearly cited. Earwig detects no copyvio. Images exist, are properly licensed, and are appropriately captioned (I believe there is no need to caption the one in the infobox). No cleanup tags or issues that would merit them. From my initial read, prose appears to be well-written, coverage appears to be both comprehensive and focused, and there are no apparent neutrality issues. Everything looks really good! Dylnuge ( Talk • Edits) 02:48, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
Comments
This was a really excellent article! This stuff above is all I'm seeing and none of it is a problem for GA, so I'm marking prose, broadness/focus, and neutrality as passes. Feel free to reply to these comments if you want; I should be back around to do the source verification in a few hours. Dylnuge ( Talk • Edits) 22:48, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Source checking
Brooklyn was granted its city charter in 1834 and during the years that followed a residential neighborhood formed in the area close to the proposed site of the city hall that was once part of the Duffield estate.Book source includes additional paragraphs about the estate.
...[they] were rewarded by an immense increase in trade. To such an extent was this the case that they found it necessary to acquire still further space to accommodate their constantly growing business. From the Landmarks Preservation Committee report:
the 87-by-100-foot annex was completed during Fall 1893.
a figure close to $1,000,000and mentions the acquisition of the adjacent 3-story building at 237 Duffield.
The new store will mark Nordstrom's first foray into Brooklynand confirms the square footage and second floor. The Brownstoner article ( [6]) is I think just to confirm the announcement proceeded the H&M one, as it doesn't really say much, though it also says
our guess is that the retailer is headed for 505 Fulton Street, so I'm not even sure it says that much. Personally I'd drop it as a source and just say "Around the same time the H&M store opened", but this is also fine as-is.
Status
Everything looks really good! Sourcing is generally solid; see the one cross above (and also the last note). I don't have much else, this article contains very good information. Everything is well presented, sourcing is excellent, organization is excellent, nothing is missing. Honestly I don't think any of my comments are holding this back from GA but I'll put this on hold to give you a chance to review and incorporate them if you want, otherwise let me know and I am happy to list it! Dylnuge ( Talk • Edits) 04:29, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
Passed — All GA criteria are met and all issues found have been fixed. Listing.