This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The result of the move request was: consensus to retain the current title at this time, per the comments below and additional discussion at Talk:Offences Against the Person Act 1861. Dekimasu よ! 05:32, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
Offences Against the Person Act 1875 →
Offences against the Person Act 1875 – This page should be moved back to its original location for the same reasons that I gave in
this edit when requesting that the article on the Offences against the Person Act 1861 should be moved back to its correct location. The only difference is that in this case, the short title is legally authorised by section 1 of the Offences against the Person Act 1875 itself, and not by the Short Titles Act 1896.
James500 (
talk) 04:57, 21 March 2018 (UTC) --Relisted.
Paine Ellsworth
put'r there
18:58, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
From the related current RM cited above: No one disputes the requestor's logic, when it comes to relevant legal documents; that simply is not connected to the capitalisation of a single letter in a Wikipedia article title, and if we start following this kind of logic, we complicate existing rules further. [1] Very well put, and equally applicable here. But perhaps best to discuss at that other RM. Andrewa ( talk) 21:55, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The result of the move request was: consensus to retain the current title at this time, per the comments below and additional discussion at Talk:Offences Against the Person Act 1861. Dekimasu よ! 05:32, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
Offences Against the Person Act 1875 →
Offences against the Person Act 1875 – This page should be moved back to its original location for the same reasons that I gave in
this edit when requesting that the article on the Offences against the Person Act 1861 should be moved back to its correct location. The only difference is that in this case, the short title is legally authorised by section 1 of the Offences against the Person Act 1875 itself, and not by the Short Titles Act 1896.
James500 (
talk) 04:57, 21 March 2018 (UTC) --Relisted.
Paine Ellsworth
put'r there
18:58, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
From the related current RM cited above: No one disputes the requestor's logic, when it comes to relevant legal documents; that simply is not connected to the capitalisation of a single letter in a Wikipedia article title, and if we start following this kind of logic, we complicate existing rules further. [1] Very well put, and equally applicable here. But perhaps best to discuss at that other RM. Andrewa ( talk) 21:55, 28 March 2018 (UTC)