This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anatomy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Anatomy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnatomyWikipedia:WikiProject AnatomyTemplate:WikiProject AnatomyAnatomy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeuroscienceWikipedia:WikiProject NeuroscienceTemplate:WikiProject Neuroscienceneuroscience articles
There is no need to have two tiny articles on parts of the nerve when this content could be covered in the main article.
The content covered in the main article would have more context and, by virtue of this, bemore accessible to readers
These articles are tiny in scope and needlessly fragmented, and it would not be much trouble to cover them with the main article on the optic nerve.
LT910001 (
talk) 04:03, 7 January 2014 (UTC)reply
LT9, these [responding to above at
optic nerve talk page] are a bad proposal. I do support merging the superior and inferior branches of the oculomotor nerve into the oculomotor nerve article. I might also be sympathetic if you had wanted to merge the optic nerve with the
optic tract and the
optic chiasm. However, it makes no sense to merge the optic nerve with the oculomotor nerve, and certainly not unless you were intending to merge all 12+
cranial nerves together. (Understand that the optic and occulomotor nerves are functionally, developmentally and anatomically separate structures, and that even together these two are still
farfrom being the only cranial nerves of the eye.)
Cesiumfrog (
talk) 01:44, 30 March 2014 (UTC)reply
Whoops, hah! Yes
Cesiumfrog I occasionally am thinking about one thing and my fingers need to keep up. The tagged pages, however, all point to
oculomotor nerve. You very diplomatically point out that I appear to be proposing a merge with the wrong
cranial nerve, very accidentally. I have moved this conversation to the correct talk page. --
LT910001 (
talk) 02:10, 30 March 2014 (UTC)reply
Oh, this makes more sense! I can't see any reason for this change to be opposed (as the potential difference in content is so small), so hopefully someone will boldly go right ahead and perform it.
Cesiumfrog (
talk) 05:57, 30 March 2014 (UTC)reply
I have completed these merges. --
LT910001 (
talk) 00:10, 4 April 2014 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anatomy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Anatomy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnatomyWikipedia:WikiProject AnatomyTemplate:WikiProject AnatomyAnatomy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeuroscienceWikipedia:WikiProject NeuroscienceTemplate:WikiProject Neuroscienceneuroscience articles
There is no need to have two tiny articles on parts of the nerve when this content could be covered in the main article.
The content covered in the main article would have more context and, by virtue of this, bemore accessible to readers
These articles are tiny in scope and needlessly fragmented, and it would not be much trouble to cover them with the main article on the optic nerve.
LT910001 (
talk) 04:03, 7 January 2014 (UTC)reply
LT9, these [responding to above at
optic nerve talk page] are a bad proposal. I do support merging the superior and inferior branches of the oculomotor nerve into the oculomotor nerve article. I might also be sympathetic if you had wanted to merge the optic nerve with the
optic tract and the
optic chiasm. However, it makes no sense to merge the optic nerve with the oculomotor nerve, and certainly not unless you were intending to merge all 12+
cranial nerves together. (Understand that the optic and occulomotor nerves are functionally, developmentally and anatomically separate structures, and that even together these two are still
farfrom being the only cranial nerves of the eye.)
Cesiumfrog (
talk) 01:44, 30 March 2014 (UTC)reply
Whoops, hah! Yes
Cesiumfrog I occasionally am thinking about one thing and my fingers need to keep up. The tagged pages, however, all point to
oculomotor nerve. You very diplomatically point out that I appear to be proposing a merge with the wrong
cranial nerve, very accidentally. I have moved this conversation to the correct talk page. --
LT910001 (
talk) 02:10, 30 March 2014 (UTC)reply
Oh, this makes more sense! I can't see any reason for this change to be opposed (as the potential difference in content is so small), so hopefully someone will boldly go right ahead and perform it.
Cesiumfrog (
talk) 05:57, 30 March 2014 (UTC)reply
I have completed these merges. --
LT910001 (
talk) 00:10, 4 April 2014 (UTC)reply