This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Material from Octobri mense was split to Magnae dei matris on 18:02, 14 October 2020 from this version. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted so long as the latter page exists. Please leave this template in place to link the article histories and preserve this attribution. |
I will be asking for a 3rd opinion about the coat of arms used on this page. I have discussed the issue on the talk page of User_talk:Xanderliptak#Coats_of_arms. I have no way to determine how user Xanderliptak designed this image and have not received an answer. I think NO coat of arms should be displayed here until the accuracy of the image has been verified, but do not not want to revert him again, hence will ask for a 3rd opinion. History2007 ( talk) 22:18, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
Now that a 3rd editor arrived, commented and reverted, the formal third opinion I asked for no longer applies. There are 3 people now. History2007 ( talk) 09:24, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Material from Octobri mense was split to Magnae dei matris on 18:02, 14 October 2020 from this version. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted so long as the latter page exists. Please leave this template in place to link the article histories and preserve this attribution. |
I will be asking for a 3rd opinion about the coat of arms used on this page. I have discussed the issue on the talk page of User_talk:Xanderliptak#Coats_of_arms. I have no way to determine how user Xanderliptak designed this image and have not received an answer. I think NO coat of arms should be displayed here until the accuracy of the image has been verified, but do not not want to revert him again, hence will ask for a 3rd opinion. History2007 ( talk) 22:18, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
Now that a 3rd editor arrived, commented and reverted, the formal third opinion I asked for no longer applies. There are 3 people now. History2007 ( talk) 09:24, 27 June 2010 (UTC)