This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Mercury may be releasing the album in Britain, but it's all but confirmed that Warner Bros. will be handling U.S. distribution.
I saw the song lengths on here and they weren't reverted. What source did they come from? Thanks in advance. Backtable Speak to Me about what I have done 03:03, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
In a edit summary, Vanishdoom said that the album cover was false and also stated that he's sick of receiving misinformation comcerning this album. I would like some evidence that this is a false cover and, if possible, the real cover. Thank you. Backtable Speak to Me about what I have done 22:35, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
Since the personnel on the album was confirmed by the press release, I saw no reason not to have it on the page. If there are any objections, post em up. -- Pritoolmachine2806 ( talk) 21:12, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
Please respect the edits of the established users. If we do a reasonable edit, then please don't revert to where it was. This page is on my watchlist, and some of the anonymous edits are just so vain. Please keep the song lengths off this page until there are one or more reliable sources supplied for them, and something like "<Mercury Records>" is not a reliable source. Also, what are the <> objects trying to prove? Also, there was a reason I took out the stub sorting on this page; see the edit summary for why I did that. Seriously, I don't want the only edits on here to be reversions of anonymous edits, which are often reversions of our own edits. The people with this page on their watchlist have a worthwhile task on their hands, and it doesn't need to be insulted by these anonymous nothersome edits. Anonymous edits are encouraged on wikipedia, but it is also encouraged, for this page, that anonymous users (and anyone else, if interested) go through the revision history of this article so that they know what edits to perform and not to perform. Some of these edits I've seen are rather absurd. Backtable Speak to Me about what I have done 02:16, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
It would be interesting to know how this system worked, whether users of non windows based computers were able to participate in this early streaming access easter egg. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.24.241.9 ( talk) 14:07, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
Is it worthy of having a trivia tag on it? Because there is a constant theme in that section that all the notes have in common. That theme is what some of the song titles are referencing. Because of this constant and non-random theme, would that section be worthy of a trivia tag? Backtable Speak to Me about what I have done 04:06, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
Someone removed the notes section, but if you ask me I think it's worth having. Every other page for Mars Volta albums has notes on the meaning of the song titles, and I see no problem with having them. And I agree Backtable, it doesn't need a trivia tag. -- Pritoolmachine2806 ( talk) 19:38, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
While you're we're it, can someone check that rather suspect translation of "Mass Of Fire" for Cotopaxi? There doesnt seem to be any evidence that this is anything but someone popping a cool sounding phrase in there. A quick search reveals it might have a more mundane translation "Shining Peak". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.11.205.131 ( talk) 14:20, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
The album was recorded at 99 Sutton Street, Brooklyn, New York. It's Omar's former home studio. It's in the liner notes of the album. 68.81.67.201 ( talk) 06:26, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
Where's the reception section? You know, where it has info on what the press/media thought of the album. Don't most album or film pages have a 'reception' section? The fact this page doesn't have one seems odd to me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.109.140.35 ( talk) 11:11, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
come to think of it... Deloused in the Comatorium is the only album of theirs that has a reception part... odd. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.109.140.35 ( talk) 11:15, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Octahedron (album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 23:10, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Mercury may be releasing the album in Britain, but it's all but confirmed that Warner Bros. will be handling U.S. distribution.
I saw the song lengths on here and they weren't reverted. What source did they come from? Thanks in advance. Backtable Speak to Me about what I have done 03:03, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
In a edit summary, Vanishdoom said that the album cover was false and also stated that he's sick of receiving misinformation comcerning this album. I would like some evidence that this is a false cover and, if possible, the real cover. Thank you. Backtable Speak to Me about what I have done 22:35, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
Since the personnel on the album was confirmed by the press release, I saw no reason not to have it on the page. If there are any objections, post em up. -- Pritoolmachine2806 ( talk) 21:12, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
Please respect the edits of the established users. If we do a reasonable edit, then please don't revert to where it was. This page is on my watchlist, and some of the anonymous edits are just so vain. Please keep the song lengths off this page until there are one or more reliable sources supplied for them, and something like "<Mercury Records>" is not a reliable source. Also, what are the <> objects trying to prove? Also, there was a reason I took out the stub sorting on this page; see the edit summary for why I did that. Seriously, I don't want the only edits on here to be reversions of anonymous edits, which are often reversions of our own edits. The people with this page on their watchlist have a worthwhile task on their hands, and it doesn't need to be insulted by these anonymous nothersome edits. Anonymous edits are encouraged on wikipedia, but it is also encouraged, for this page, that anonymous users (and anyone else, if interested) go through the revision history of this article so that they know what edits to perform and not to perform. Some of these edits I've seen are rather absurd. Backtable Speak to Me about what I have done 02:16, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
It would be interesting to know how this system worked, whether users of non windows based computers were able to participate in this early streaming access easter egg. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.24.241.9 ( talk) 14:07, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
Is it worthy of having a trivia tag on it? Because there is a constant theme in that section that all the notes have in common. That theme is what some of the song titles are referencing. Because of this constant and non-random theme, would that section be worthy of a trivia tag? Backtable Speak to Me about what I have done 04:06, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
Someone removed the notes section, but if you ask me I think it's worth having. Every other page for Mars Volta albums has notes on the meaning of the song titles, and I see no problem with having them. And I agree Backtable, it doesn't need a trivia tag. -- Pritoolmachine2806 ( talk) 19:38, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
While you're we're it, can someone check that rather suspect translation of "Mass Of Fire" for Cotopaxi? There doesnt seem to be any evidence that this is anything but someone popping a cool sounding phrase in there. A quick search reveals it might have a more mundane translation "Shining Peak". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.11.205.131 ( talk) 14:20, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
The album was recorded at 99 Sutton Street, Brooklyn, New York. It's Omar's former home studio. It's in the liner notes of the album. 68.81.67.201 ( talk) 06:26, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
Where's the reception section? You know, where it has info on what the press/media thought of the album. Don't most album or film pages have a 'reception' section? The fact this page doesn't have one seems odd to me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.109.140.35 ( talk) 11:11, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
come to think of it... Deloused in the Comatorium is the only album of theirs that has a reception part... odd. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.109.140.35 ( talk) 11:15, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Octahedron (album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 23:10, 14 September 2017 (UTC)