Ochetellus has been listed as one of the
Natural sciences good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: June 10, 2015. ( Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Going to expand the genus Ochetellus article and try to get it to good article status. I'll also work on the well known species
Ochetellus glaber. Quite an ant I have been fond with since I was a little kid, and I was quite disappointed with how small its article is.
Burklemore1 (
talk)
18:57, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Cwmhiraeth ( talk · contribs) 10:33, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
On first inspection this article seems reasonably well written and seems to adequately cover the topic. Some points that occurred to me:
Rewritten.
"Will" has now been removed from description and lead sections.
No problem.
Rewritten.
Rewritten.
Reworded.
Reworded.
Reworded.
Thank you, I should have read it through a couple of times.
Changed.
Oops, I may have made a mistake with this sentence. I believe I was meant to state its unique nesting habits. I have rewritten the sentence.
Did a slight rewrite with the sentence, it should be correct now. I'll keep the fluids and sweets in the sentence as I have mentioned they prefer to consume these when they forage into homes, but I have removed tuna and peanut butter.
Good point, I'll add that in instead. Will remove tuna and peanut butter.
Yes I am. I have clarified that it is a lizard so non-Australian readers can understand and have now split the predators part into its own paragraph. How I wrote it looks a little odd, but it does the job.
I have seen my chickens and other birds eat them if I lift up the rocks they would nest under, but I haven't been able to find a source that actually states this. I'll look around though and see what I can find.
Burklemore1 (
talk)
16:57, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
I'll go have a look.
Moved.
Thank you for the review. Burklemore1 ( talk) 08:26, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
Ochetellus has been listed as one of the
Natural sciences good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: June 10, 2015. ( Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Going to expand the genus Ochetellus article and try to get it to good article status. I'll also work on the well known species
Ochetellus glaber. Quite an ant I have been fond with since I was a little kid, and I was quite disappointed with how small its article is.
Burklemore1 (
talk)
18:57, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Cwmhiraeth ( talk · contribs) 10:33, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
On first inspection this article seems reasonably well written and seems to adequately cover the topic. Some points that occurred to me:
Rewritten.
"Will" has now been removed from description and lead sections.
No problem.
Rewritten.
Rewritten.
Reworded.
Reworded.
Reworded.
Thank you, I should have read it through a couple of times.
Changed.
Oops, I may have made a mistake with this sentence. I believe I was meant to state its unique nesting habits. I have rewritten the sentence.
Did a slight rewrite with the sentence, it should be correct now. I'll keep the fluids and sweets in the sentence as I have mentioned they prefer to consume these when they forage into homes, but I have removed tuna and peanut butter.
Good point, I'll add that in instead. Will remove tuna and peanut butter.
Yes I am. I have clarified that it is a lizard so non-Australian readers can understand and have now split the predators part into its own paragraph. How I wrote it looks a little odd, but it does the job.
I have seen my chickens and other birds eat them if I lift up the rocks they would nest under, but I haven't been able to find a source that actually states this. I'll look around though and see what I can find.
Burklemore1 (
talk)
16:57, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
I'll go have a look.
Moved.
Thank you for the review. Burklemore1 ( talk) 08:26, 10 June 2015 (UTC)