![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This is a politically motivated attack and should be deleted. Johnpacklambert ( talk) 21:04, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
I disagree! This article is well-sourced. References abound:
Thanks! -- Inetpup ( talk) 07:15, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
A user removed the following link [1]:
He stated rm bad link per WP:EL (blog), but this the home page isn't a blog. The user erred in removing the link because the whole site isn't a blog. If he applied this logic then every newspaper site that hosts a blog (such as USA Today) would be disqualified from being cited. Thanks! --Inetpup:o3 ⌈〒⌋▰ ⌈♎⌋ 04:51, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
Why did the proposition fail at the polls, and by such a wide margin? San Francisco is pretty liberal, isn't it? You'd think it would have passed. Stonemason89 ( talk) 00:44, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This is a politically motivated attack and should be deleted. Johnpacklambert ( talk) 21:04, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
I disagree! This article is well-sourced. References abound:
Thanks! -- Inetpup ( talk) 07:15, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
A user removed the following link [1]:
He stated rm bad link per WP:EL (blog), but this the home page isn't a blog. The user erred in removing the link because the whole site isn't a blog. If he applied this logic then every newspaper site that hosts a blog (such as USA Today) would be disqualified from being cited. Thanks! --Inetpup:o3 ⌈〒⌋▰ ⌈♎⌋ 04:51, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
Why did the proposition fail at the polls, and by such a wide margin? San Francisco is pretty liberal, isn't it? You'd think it would have passed. Stonemason89 ( talk) 00:44, 5 May 2010 (UTC)