![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Jwqiqiqiiqkw
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 30 August 2021 and 10 December 2021. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Sabrinazdravkovic,
Bakershum,
Qjoselyn,
Peacepls,
Maralogan,
Ashmart.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 01:47, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 4 January 2019 and 17 April 2019. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Docinmaking.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 05:33, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
This article has been listed on Wikipedia:Votes for deletion in the past. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Obstetrics and gynecology for the discussion archive.
No "M.O." here.. . terminiation of pregnancy is not actually the most common gynaecological operation:
-[User:Reboot Reboot]
I want to know, are there gynecologists who do -not- perform said procedure? Are they difficult to find?
Most Ob/Gyns in the US do not perform pregnancy terminations. All of them are trained on how to perform the procedure as it is the same procedure done to treat an incomplete miscarriage, but most don't perform terminations. D.c.camero ( talk) 05:23, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Isn't this article big enough to be split in two, one about obstetrics and one about gynaecology? - Kimiko 19:24 Apr 19, 2003 (UTC)
Okay, just did that. -- Kimiko 22:59, 12 Aug 2003 (UTC)
If the article has been split into 2 longer ones, is there any need for this very short one?
Joyous 23:04, Jun 4, 2004 (UTC)
This page could be kept if it were cleaned up a bit, also there is no definition of O&G anywhere on the page... I am in no way medically inclined, but if someone could do the honours, that would make my day. haz ( user talk) 19:51, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
The result of the debate was no consensus; however, the first move ("americanize spelling") was uncalled for and not in GF, IMO. Therefore, I've reverted it. — Nightstallion (?) 10:42, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
PubMed has 3.6 times more hits for gynecolog* than for gynaecolog*. For Google, the gynecology:gynaecology ratio is closer to 10:1. I think there's a pretty good case for gynecology being the preferred spelling.
I added a link to HPV vaccine in the "See also" section. Since cervical cancer is the second most common cancer in women worldwide - and since it's nearly always caused by HPV, the HPV vaccine is arguably the biggest news in gynecology this past year. The topic might merit a quick mention in the body of the article. Retroid 22:04, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
This really didn't belong on this article: Stevage 22:09, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
I vote that it be renamed in accordance to the british spelling, As it is the most commonly used. I back this move 100%. augrunt 06:37, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
Could someone with access to the knowledge write something on the history of this specialism? When specific doctors first called themselves gynaecologists or the like? OED 1872 T. G. THOMAS Dis. Women 41 Gynæcologists ranged themselves into two parties. 1867 New Syd. Soc. Retrosp. 368 Gynæcology, embracing the Physiology and Pathology of the non-pregnant state. 1876 (title) Transactions of the [American] Gynecological Society. 131.111.161.131 ( talk) 09:30, 14 April 2009 (UTC)>>>>> re rj) boys like girls jsfksdjfi sfiwfmnfio —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.100.88.209 ( talk) 19:02, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
The usage of Midwifery and the naming of Obstetrics (Midwifery) is under discussion, see talk:Obstetrics (Midwifery) -- 67.70.32.190 ( talk) 05:20, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Why the push to validate midwifery as a medical specialty? Midwives do not attend medical school, do not have medical doctorates and therefore are irrelevant Quityourbs ( talk) 03:54, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
What's the history of this weird abbreviation? Why is it usually written in all-caps? And when did people become too lazy to use the individual words - was this a 20th-century thing, or older? 86.191.247.118 ( talk) 22:46, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi! I'm planning on adding more information to the OBGYN certification processes for both the U.S. and U.K., and other countries if I can find them.
However, my largest edit would be the actual reorganization of the page sections. I would like to retitle the current "Education and Training (residency)" section--which includes information on OB/GYN certification in the U.S. and U.K.--to "Certification process by country". I would then like to begin a new section, "Education and training in residency", which would focus more on the actual content of residency programs (rather than the OB/GYN certification process) and would include new developments in OB/GYN curriculums, like LGBTQ+ specific healthcare training.
I am doing Wikipedia edits through at class at the university level, so I am new to Wikipedia. If you have any thoughts or feedback I would love to hear it! Please let me know.-- Maralogan ( talk) 00:47, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Like obviously the topic has importance and I don't deny that. However, the vast majority of this article seems like it would be far better placed in this article: /info/en/?search=Healthcare_and_the_LGBT_community
Right now "inclusivity" takes up more or less 2/3 of this article. I feel like its relevance is minimal at best and this massive, bloated, multiple section long rambling should be condensed into a much smaller section on the main article page to keep the focus of the article on the actual topic at hand, rather than an offshoot topic like inclusivity problems for LGBT patients. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Benfjamison ( talk • contribs) 15:46, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Jwqiqiqiiqkw
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 30 August 2021 and 10 December 2021. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Sabrinazdravkovic,
Bakershum,
Qjoselyn,
Peacepls,
Maralogan,
Ashmart.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 01:47, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 4 January 2019 and 17 April 2019. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Docinmaking.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 05:33, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
This article has been listed on Wikipedia:Votes for deletion in the past. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Obstetrics and gynecology for the discussion archive.
No "M.O." here.. . terminiation of pregnancy is not actually the most common gynaecological operation:
-[User:Reboot Reboot]
I want to know, are there gynecologists who do -not- perform said procedure? Are they difficult to find?
Most Ob/Gyns in the US do not perform pregnancy terminations. All of them are trained on how to perform the procedure as it is the same procedure done to treat an incomplete miscarriage, but most don't perform terminations. D.c.camero ( talk) 05:23, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Isn't this article big enough to be split in two, one about obstetrics and one about gynaecology? - Kimiko 19:24 Apr 19, 2003 (UTC)
Okay, just did that. -- Kimiko 22:59, 12 Aug 2003 (UTC)
If the article has been split into 2 longer ones, is there any need for this very short one?
Joyous 23:04, Jun 4, 2004 (UTC)
This page could be kept if it were cleaned up a bit, also there is no definition of O&G anywhere on the page... I am in no way medically inclined, but if someone could do the honours, that would make my day. haz ( user talk) 19:51, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
The result of the debate was no consensus; however, the first move ("americanize spelling") was uncalled for and not in GF, IMO. Therefore, I've reverted it. — Nightstallion (?) 10:42, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
PubMed has 3.6 times more hits for gynecolog* than for gynaecolog*. For Google, the gynecology:gynaecology ratio is closer to 10:1. I think there's a pretty good case for gynecology being the preferred spelling.
I added a link to HPV vaccine in the "See also" section. Since cervical cancer is the second most common cancer in women worldwide - and since it's nearly always caused by HPV, the HPV vaccine is arguably the biggest news in gynecology this past year. The topic might merit a quick mention in the body of the article. Retroid 22:04, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
This really didn't belong on this article: Stevage 22:09, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
I vote that it be renamed in accordance to the british spelling, As it is the most commonly used. I back this move 100%. augrunt 06:37, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
Could someone with access to the knowledge write something on the history of this specialism? When specific doctors first called themselves gynaecologists or the like? OED 1872 T. G. THOMAS Dis. Women 41 Gynæcologists ranged themselves into two parties. 1867 New Syd. Soc. Retrosp. 368 Gynæcology, embracing the Physiology and Pathology of the non-pregnant state. 1876 (title) Transactions of the [American] Gynecological Society. 131.111.161.131 ( talk) 09:30, 14 April 2009 (UTC)>>>>> re rj) boys like girls jsfksdjfi sfiwfmnfio —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.100.88.209 ( talk) 19:02, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
The usage of Midwifery and the naming of Obstetrics (Midwifery) is under discussion, see talk:Obstetrics (Midwifery) -- 67.70.32.190 ( talk) 05:20, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Why the push to validate midwifery as a medical specialty? Midwives do not attend medical school, do not have medical doctorates and therefore are irrelevant Quityourbs ( talk) 03:54, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
What's the history of this weird abbreviation? Why is it usually written in all-caps? And when did people become too lazy to use the individual words - was this a 20th-century thing, or older? 86.191.247.118 ( talk) 22:46, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi! I'm planning on adding more information to the OBGYN certification processes for both the U.S. and U.K., and other countries if I can find them.
However, my largest edit would be the actual reorganization of the page sections. I would like to retitle the current "Education and Training (residency)" section--which includes information on OB/GYN certification in the U.S. and U.K.--to "Certification process by country". I would then like to begin a new section, "Education and training in residency", which would focus more on the actual content of residency programs (rather than the OB/GYN certification process) and would include new developments in OB/GYN curriculums, like LGBTQ+ specific healthcare training.
I am doing Wikipedia edits through at class at the university level, so I am new to Wikipedia. If you have any thoughts or feedback I would love to hear it! Please let me know.-- Maralogan ( talk) 00:47, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Like obviously the topic has importance and I don't deny that. However, the vast majority of this article seems like it would be far better placed in this article: /info/en/?search=Healthcare_and_the_LGBT_community
Right now "inclusivity" takes up more or less 2/3 of this article. I feel like its relevance is minimal at best and this massive, bloated, multiple section long rambling should be condensed into a much smaller section on the main article page to keep the focus of the article on the actual topic at hand, rather than an offshoot topic like inclusivity problems for LGBT patients. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Benfjamison ( talk • contribs) 15:46, 5 June 2022 (UTC)