 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Proposed merge with Space-oblique Mercator projection
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Space-oblique Mercator projection is clearly a specific application of Oblique Mercator projection, I cannot see justification for two separate articles Polyamorph ( talk) 07:56, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
- Weak Oppose Space-oblique has been around for over a decade while oblique was just created from a redirect within the past day or so, these are two separate map projections with differing histories and there's probably enough for two articles, but in case there is a merge, I think Space-oblique should be the parent article. SportingFlyer T· C 08:04, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
- Space-oblique is derived from the oblique Mercator projection, it is simply a special case. So merging in the opposite direction would not make much sense.
Polyamorph (
talk) 08:19, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
- It's actually not specifically "derived" from oblique Mercator unless you're making a bad math joke - it's a separate projection completely (it was almost named "Colvo's Projection") and discussed separately as such in cartography. Don't see the need for the merge.
SportingFlyer
T·
C 08:25, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
- OK, poor choice of words on my part, but I think I can see your point. I'll withdraw the merge proposal. Polyamorph ( talk) 09:06, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
- It's actually not specifically "derived" from oblique Mercator unless you're making a bad math joke - it's a separate projection completely (it was almost named "Colvo's Projection") and discussed separately as such in cartography. Don't see the need for the merge.
SportingFlyer
T·
C 08:25, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
- Space-oblique is derived from the oblique Mercator projection, it is simply a special case. So merging in the opposite direction would not make much sense.
Polyamorph (
talk) 08:19, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
|
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proposed merge with Space-oblique Mercator projection
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Space-oblique Mercator projection is clearly a specific application of Oblique Mercator projection, I cannot see justification for two separate articles Polyamorph ( talk) 07:56, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
- Weak Oppose Space-oblique has been around for over a decade while oblique was just created from a redirect within the past day or so, these are two separate map projections with differing histories and there's probably enough for two articles, but in case there is a merge, I think Space-oblique should be the parent article. SportingFlyer T· C 08:04, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
- Space-oblique is derived from the oblique Mercator projection, it is simply a special case. So merging in the opposite direction would not make much sense.
Polyamorph (
talk) 08:19, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
- It's actually not specifically "derived" from oblique Mercator unless you're making a bad math joke - it's a separate projection completely (it was almost named "Colvo's Projection") and discussed separately as such in cartography. Don't see the need for the merge.
SportingFlyer
T·
C 08:25, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
- OK, poor choice of words on my part, but I think I can see your point. I'll withdraw the merge proposal. Polyamorph ( talk) 09:06, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
- It's actually not specifically "derived" from oblique Mercator unless you're making a bad math joke - it's a separate projection completely (it was almost named "Colvo's Projection") and discussed separately as such in cartography. Don't see the need for the merge.
SportingFlyer
T·
C 08:25, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
- Space-oblique is derived from the oblique Mercator projection, it is simply a special case. So merging in the opposite direction would not make much sense.
Polyamorph (
talk) 08:19, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.