This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Obernewtyn (novel) has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
I am aiming for a GA article. What do you all think should be added or changed? -- Limolover ( talk) 08:16, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Tea with toast ( talk • message • contribs • count • logs • email)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
I appreciate the work that you have put into the article thus far, and I hope you can use the things that I have listed here to make further improvements on the article. If you have any more questions about this review or about any of wikipedia's policies, please let me know! (The link to my talk page is the brown kanji symbol after my name. It is Japanese for "talk") Thank you for introducing me to this article. --
Tea with toast
(話)
03:07, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Yllosubmarine ( talk · contribs) 14:42, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
Hello! I've volunteered to review this article for GAC. I will post my comments within the next day or two, so thanks in advance for your patience. I see this is the article's second nom, so hopefully it won't take much to get it promoted! While you're waiting, perhaps you'd like to help reduce the backlog? María ( yllo submarine) 14:42, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
As I said above, since this is the article's second nomination at GAC, I believe the article is in fairly good shape. I've read the previous review, and it seems that the previous issues have been addressed. I have some minor comments/suggestions to improve the article even further so that it really shines as a GA. First, here is how it stands against the
criteria:
I think that about covers it. Here's
the diff for all of the minor changes I made; like I said, I didn't mess with the plot details, so you may consider trimming here and there for readability. I'll put the article on hold to give you time to consider my suggestions. If you have any questions, just let me know!
María (
yllo
submarine)
14:58, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
Thanks so much for your review. I believe I have now made all the appropriate changes. -- Limolover talk 04:57, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Obernewtyn (novel). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked=
to true
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 23:29, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Obernewtyn (novel) has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
I am aiming for a GA article. What do you all think should be added or changed? -- Limolover ( talk) 08:16, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Tea with toast ( talk • message • contribs • count • logs • email)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
I appreciate the work that you have put into the article thus far, and I hope you can use the things that I have listed here to make further improvements on the article. If you have any more questions about this review or about any of wikipedia's policies, please let me know! (The link to my talk page is the brown kanji symbol after my name. It is Japanese for "talk") Thank you for introducing me to this article. --
Tea with toast
(話)
03:07, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Yllosubmarine ( talk · contribs) 14:42, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
Hello! I've volunteered to review this article for GAC. I will post my comments within the next day or two, so thanks in advance for your patience. I see this is the article's second nom, so hopefully it won't take much to get it promoted! While you're waiting, perhaps you'd like to help reduce the backlog? María ( yllo submarine) 14:42, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
As I said above, since this is the article's second nomination at GAC, I believe the article is in fairly good shape. I've read the previous review, and it seems that the previous issues have been addressed. I have some minor comments/suggestions to improve the article even further so that it really shines as a GA. First, here is how it stands against the
criteria:
I think that about covers it. Here's
the diff for all of the minor changes I made; like I said, I didn't mess with the plot details, so you may consider trimming here and there for readability. I'll put the article on hold to give you time to consider my suggestions. If you have any questions, just let me know!
María (
yllo
submarine)
14:58, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
Thanks so much for your review. I believe I have now made all the appropriate changes. -- Limolover talk 04:57, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Obernewtyn (novel). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked=
to true
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 23:29, 20 July 2016 (UTC)