This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Currently - seems there's several wikilinks to the purportedly newly discovered life form "obelisk" - " Obelisk (virology)" and " Obelisk (life form)" and " Obelisk (viroid)" - perhaps some merger(s) would help? - Comments Welcome - iac - Stay Safe and Healthy !! - Drbogdan ( talk) 14:10, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Don't you think that the current image (an Egyptian obelisk) it is a bit confusing ?
I think a proper image could be something like this of a viroid :
Alexcalamaro ( talk) 18:44, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Moved. ( closed by non-admin page mover) Adumbrativus ( talk) 08:08, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Obelisk (life form) → Obelisk (biology) – Per User:PaleoNeonate's suggestion Bremps ... 01:15, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
This new life form is described in one unreviewed preprint that is entirely computational and contains no experimental work to validate the results. Even if this passes the threshold for a Wikipedia article, the language here should be way more hypothetical. 147.235.193.166 ( talk) 12:06, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
This IP is adding some generic text and some refences which do not say anything about obelisks. "metatranscriptomic analysis of RNA sequencing", whatever it is, must be covered somewhere else. - Altenmann >talk 22:28, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
"are not homologous with the genetic code": AFAIK, not the genetic code, but their sequence of bases has no homologs. I may be wrong, of course. I would recommend to say: "...with the sequences of any other living forms" . ThePaw ( talk) 18:15, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Currently - seems there's several wikilinks to the purportedly newly discovered life form "obelisk" - " Obelisk (virology)" and " Obelisk (life form)" and " Obelisk (viroid)" - perhaps some merger(s) would help? - Comments Welcome - iac - Stay Safe and Healthy !! - Drbogdan ( talk) 14:10, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Don't you think that the current image (an Egyptian obelisk) it is a bit confusing ?
I think a proper image could be something like this of a viroid :
Alexcalamaro ( talk) 18:44, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Moved. ( closed by non-admin page mover) Adumbrativus ( talk) 08:08, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Obelisk (life form) → Obelisk (biology) – Per User:PaleoNeonate's suggestion Bremps ... 01:15, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
This new life form is described in one unreviewed preprint that is entirely computational and contains no experimental work to validate the results. Even if this passes the threshold for a Wikipedia article, the language here should be way more hypothetical. 147.235.193.166 ( talk) 12:06, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
This IP is adding some generic text and some refences which do not say anything about obelisks. "metatranscriptomic analysis of RNA sequencing", whatever it is, must be covered somewhere else. - Altenmann >talk 22:28, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
"are not homologous with the genetic code": AFAIK, not the genetic code, but their sequence of bases has no homologs. I may be wrong, of course. I would recommend to say: "...with the sequences of any other living forms" . ThePaw ( talk) 18:15, 28 April 2024 (UTC)