This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
OTV-2 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article deals with a military
black project.
Because of the nature of such projects, the most authoritative sources (any involved governments and defense contractors) may not even acknowledge its existence. The most reliable sources may be highly speculative. Please ensure that the article is well and reliably sourced and does not contain unverifiable information or vague predictions.For more details, see the black project working group of the military history project. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of OTV-2's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "sfnfeb":
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:51, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
What exactly is the rationale for the move here? WP:COMMONNAME makes clear that if there is a more commonly used variant then it is preferred over official/technical versions. Besides, USA-226 is just one of a few "official names" for this vehicle. ChiZeroOne ( talk) 17:37, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
PDF Rendering Download of USA-226 has been Blocked by forces outside Wikipedia as well as sister article Boeing X-37. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.65.121.47 ( talk) 21:06, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 17:37, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:USSF-52 which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 22:19, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
OTV-2 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article deals with a military
black project.
Because of the nature of such projects, the most authoritative sources (any involved governments and defense contractors) may not even acknowledge its existence. The most reliable sources may be highly speculative. Please ensure that the article is well and reliably sourced and does not contain unverifiable information or vague predictions.For more details, see the black project working group of the military history project. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of OTV-2's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "sfnfeb":
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:51, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
What exactly is the rationale for the move here? WP:COMMONNAME makes clear that if there is a more commonly used variant then it is preferred over official/technical versions. Besides, USA-226 is just one of a few "official names" for this vehicle. ChiZeroOne ( talk) 17:37, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
PDF Rendering Download of USA-226 has been Blocked by forces outside Wikipedia as well as sister article Boeing X-37. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.65.121.47 ( talk) 21:06, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 17:37, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:USSF-52 which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 22:19, 11 December 2023 (UTC)