This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
This discussion page is for the article OS-9 which is about an operating system produced by Microware in Iowa. The Macintosh OS (version 9) is another thing altogether.
The article claims that OS-9 beat Apple by a number of years regarding the production of a multitasking OS with protected memory and a GUI. Apple had all of those things with its Lisa, a system that was in development for many years before it was released in 1983. Please provide proof that OS-9 beat Apple by providing dates in the article and citations.
Note that this section does not belong here. It refers to the Macintosh operating system, not the OS-9 of this article. It really should be moved. ww 06:36, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
Thanks! Intrigue 03:37, 22 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Thanks! The Wikipedia mainpage crashes my iMac when I open it with IE5.3 for Mac... Intrigue 15:58, 23 Sep 2004 (UTC)
The discussion page itself exemplifies the supposedly nonexistent confusion between Mac OS9 and OS-9. Nice bit of irony there.
To Do: OS-9 Easter Egg section. (XCC compiler, SCF, and hidden messages in the kernel/modules.) -- Allen Huffman 19:32, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
I removed the following:
The major limitations (in both access time and maximum capacity) is that no mass storage other than floppy disk were supported by Radio Shack, nor did Radio Shack ever release a version of the CoCo with better hardware (that is, more hardware resources). Hard disks were available only from third party sources. Radio Shack continued to emphasize the games orientation for the machine until it was discontinued.
This statement is false. Tandy sold an MFM hard disk controller. I remember it was listed in the 1988 radio shack catalog. Oregonerik ( talk) 22:02, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
An image used in this article, File:Nitros-9 CoCo.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 18 November 2011
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 13:02, 18 November 2011 (UTC) |
Please consider removing the 'does not meet notability guidelines' notice on this article. It has adequate references. Even if OS-9 has for the most part fallen by the wayside of OS history, the fact that it is no longer in heavy use does not mean one should ignore its history. Microware, as a player in the 1980s and 1990s RTOS market, and computing systems such as the Tandy Color Computer, the Sharp X68000, Philips' CD-I etc. were significant during their time for those not isolated to working in the IBM PC sphere. It was widely used in many industrial control systems (Allen-Bradley manuals for their OS-9 systems are still widely available on the internet as one example) and at CERN (I will research and add references if required). If the criterion for Wikipedia entries on operating systems is confined to mainstream PC 'notability', then one should also consider removing the articles for BeOS, VxWorks, PSOS, microRTX, u/COS, QNX, and any other OS of which most non-technical people have never heard. Russtopia ( talk) 08:00, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
This discussion page is for the article OS-9 which is about an operating system produced by Microware in Iowa. The Macintosh OS (version 9) is another thing altogether.
The article claims that OS-9 beat Apple by a number of years regarding the production of a multitasking OS with protected memory and a GUI. Apple had all of those things with its Lisa, a system that was in development for many years before it was released in 1983. Please provide proof that OS-9 beat Apple by providing dates in the article and citations.
Note that this section does not belong here. It refers to the Macintosh operating system, not the OS-9 of this article. It really should be moved. ww 06:36, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
Thanks! Intrigue 03:37, 22 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Thanks! The Wikipedia mainpage crashes my iMac when I open it with IE5.3 for Mac... Intrigue 15:58, 23 Sep 2004 (UTC)
The discussion page itself exemplifies the supposedly nonexistent confusion between Mac OS9 and OS-9. Nice bit of irony there.
To Do: OS-9 Easter Egg section. (XCC compiler, SCF, and hidden messages in the kernel/modules.) -- Allen Huffman 19:32, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
I removed the following:
The major limitations (in both access time and maximum capacity) is that no mass storage other than floppy disk were supported by Radio Shack, nor did Radio Shack ever release a version of the CoCo with better hardware (that is, more hardware resources). Hard disks were available only from third party sources. Radio Shack continued to emphasize the games orientation for the machine until it was discontinued.
This statement is false. Tandy sold an MFM hard disk controller. I remember it was listed in the 1988 radio shack catalog. Oregonerik ( talk) 22:02, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
An image used in this article, File:Nitros-9 CoCo.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 18 November 2011
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 13:02, 18 November 2011 (UTC) |
Please consider removing the 'does not meet notability guidelines' notice on this article. It has adequate references. Even if OS-9 has for the most part fallen by the wayside of OS history, the fact that it is no longer in heavy use does not mean one should ignore its history. Microware, as a player in the 1980s and 1990s RTOS market, and computing systems such as the Tandy Color Computer, the Sharp X68000, Philips' CD-I etc. were significant during their time for those not isolated to working in the IBM PC sphere. It was widely used in many industrial control systems (Allen-Bradley manuals for their OS-9 systems are still widely available on the internet as one example) and at CERN (I will research and add references if required). If the criterion for Wikipedia entries on operating systems is confined to mainstream PC 'notability', then one should also consider removing the articles for BeOS, VxWorks, PSOS, microRTX, u/COS, QNX, and any other OS of which most non-technical people have never heard. Russtopia ( talk) 08:00, 26 November 2012 (UTC)