This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Is the Bellingcat report on the OPCW [1] really noteworthy enough to be included here? We don't want this article to become an edit war battleground do we? I recommend deleting that sentence rather than fighting over sources. It's tangential. BobFromBrockley ( talk) 16:30, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
How can this article not include a section on the OPCW inspectors who have gone on record repudiating the organization's report on the Duoma attack? Just today, Aaron Mate at Grayzone reported that internal OPCW documents refute reported claims by the DG and show the leading whistleblower was a key member of the investigation team. 76.64.51.70 ( talk) 03:13, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Is the Bellingcat report on the OPCW [1] really noteworthy enough to be included here? We don't want this article to become an edit war battleground do we? I recommend deleting that sentence rather than fighting over sources. It's tangential. BobFromBrockley ( talk) 16:30, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
How can this article not include a section on the OPCW inspectors who have gone on record repudiating the organization's report on the Duoma attack? Just today, Aaron Mate at Grayzone reported that internal OPCW documents refute reported claims by the DG and show the leading whistleblower was a key member of the investigation team. 76.64.51.70 ( talk) 03:13, 7 May 2020 (UTC)