From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Infobox

I switched the infobox to the type used for most (if not all) other exosolar planet articles on Wikipedia. I copied what info there was from the previous template except for the eccentricity which was listed as 0. I think whoever filled that in meant unknown by this as an eccentricity of 0 would be practically impossible and no error measurements were given. I filled in the info for the star portion of the box from the article on 10b's parent star. - AndrewBuck 18:27, 25 July 2007 (UTC) reply

We?

it says "We reported a tentative radial velocity [...] Now we are able to rule out a [...]". this is wrong. right? 190.21.229.180 ( talk) 23:11, 4 May 2008 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Infobox

I switched the infobox to the type used for most (if not all) other exosolar planet articles on Wikipedia. I copied what info there was from the previous template except for the eccentricity which was listed as 0. I think whoever filled that in meant unknown by this as an eccentricity of 0 would be practically impossible and no error measurements were given. I filled in the info for the star portion of the box from the article on 10b's parent star. - AndrewBuck 18:27, 25 July 2007 (UTC) reply

We?

it says "We reported a tentative radial velocity [...] Now we are able to rule out a [...]". this is wrong. right? 190.21.229.180 ( talk) 23:11, 4 May 2008 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook