![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
I disagree with this page being moved to the stylized version Nymph()maniac. This is not how people will search for the article. -- Another Believer ( Talk) 00:10, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
I mean, the IMDB article is one thing, but this is another. It seems too out there to be legitimate. HectorAE ( talk) 21:57, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
"Strange erotic journey form Milan to Minsk" is a quote from Seinfeld. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.96.93.140 ( talk) 01:37, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
Per this. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 15:04, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
Per this. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 20:08, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
It surprises me that nobody else likes to contribute to the plot section. Has nobody seen the film, or is everybody too lazy/uninterested? - Patrick ( talk) 22:31, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
I discovered this article today in a form that required a review and corresponding copyedit, and ended up spending a fair amount of time on it. Citations needed to to be added and the content needed to be adjusted to align with the content of the citations. I think it needs further work, so it would be good to receive comments or contributions from other copyeditors.-- Soulparadox ( talk) 12:19, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
It would be reasonable to illustrate this article with the official Director's Cut poster, which signifies the original, complete, uncensored 5½ hour version of the film. Can anyone help, please? It's available here: http://www.bbook.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/nymphomaniac-poster.jpg -- Minutae ( talk) 20:03, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
IMDb, Rotten Tomatoes, Metacritic, Box Office Mojo, etc. all present this as two films rather than one. Should Wikipedia follow suit? 85.250.155.74 ( talk) 19:35, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
Well, if there is no consensus, we can close this for the time being. No harm done. 85.250.155.74 ( talk) 20:00, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
To produce scenes of unsimulated sex, von Trier used digital compositing to superimpose the genitals of pornographic film actors onto the bodies of the film's actors. Producer Louise Vesth explained during the Cannes Film Festival:
"We shot the actors pretending to have sex and then had the body doubles, who really did have sex, and in post we will digital impose the two. So above the waist it will be the star and the below the waist it will be the doubles"
A number of different users on IMDB are saying this isn't the case and that in another Von Trier said he'd only said it so the American market wouldn't hassle him, or something to that effect. Anyone know more about it? --— Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.171.164.195 ( talk • contribs) 22:57, 30 March 2014
Re this edit Having watched the films, at the end, I watched only a sexual advance on a self confessed "Nymphomaniac". This is not someone with a "sexual addiction problem" - she herself, during the film, dispels this notion. It might arguably have been inappropriate in the circumstances but there was no attempt at penetration and certainly no force by the guy when rebuffed; I saw no attempt to rape her. I have rewatched the ending...the guy does not climb into bed with her either. Bosley John Bosley ( talk) 17:15, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
What does "Joe lubricates in front of the body" mean? Like, she becomes aroused, turned on? That's a more usual way of putting it than "lubricates", "lubricates" is a transitive verb! 188.29.164.127 ( talk) 02:40, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
Where is it set? Jim Michael ( talk) 09:40, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
" K (Jamie Bell), a sadist who violently assaults women seeking his company."
This is incorrect. The women aren't 'seeking his company' - they are masochists, seeking exactly what he does to them.
MarkinBoston ( talk) 17:03, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
I disagree with this page being moved to the stylized version Nymph()maniac. This is not how people will search for the article. -- Another Believer ( Talk) 00:10, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
I mean, the IMDB article is one thing, but this is another. It seems too out there to be legitimate. HectorAE ( talk) 21:57, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
"Strange erotic journey form Milan to Minsk" is a quote from Seinfeld. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.96.93.140 ( talk) 01:37, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
Per this. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 15:04, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
Per this. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 20:08, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
It surprises me that nobody else likes to contribute to the plot section. Has nobody seen the film, or is everybody too lazy/uninterested? - Patrick ( talk) 22:31, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
I discovered this article today in a form that required a review and corresponding copyedit, and ended up spending a fair amount of time on it. Citations needed to to be added and the content needed to be adjusted to align with the content of the citations. I think it needs further work, so it would be good to receive comments or contributions from other copyeditors.-- Soulparadox ( talk) 12:19, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
It would be reasonable to illustrate this article with the official Director's Cut poster, which signifies the original, complete, uncensored 5½ hour version of the film. Can anyone help, please? It's available here: http://www.bbook.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/nymphomaniac-poster.jpg -- Minutae ( talk) 20:03, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
IMDb, Rotten Tomatoes, Metacritic, Box Office Mojo, etc. all present this as two films rather than one. Should Wikipedia follow suit? 85.250.155.74 ( talk) 19:35, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
Well, if there is no consensus, we can close this for the time being. No harm done. 85.250.155.74 ( talk) 20:00, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
To produce scenes of unsimulated sex, von Trier used digital compositing to superimpose the genitals of pornographic film actors onto the bodies of the film's actors. Producer Louise Vesth explained during the Cannes Film Festival:
"We shot the actors pretending to have sex and then had the body doubles, who really did have sex, and in post we will digital impose the two. So above the waist it will be the star and the below the waist it will be the doubles"
A number of different users on IMDB are saying this isn't the case and that in another Von Trier said he'd only said it so the American market wouldn't hassle him, or something to that effect. Anyone know more about it? --— Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.171.164.195 ( talk • contribs) 22:57, 30 March 2014
Re this edit Having watched the films, at the end, I watched only a sexual advance on a self confessed "Nymphomaniac". This is not someone with a "sexual addiction problem" - she herself, during the film, dispels this notion. It might arguably have been inappropriate in the circumstances but there was no attempt at penetration and certainly no force by the guy when rebuffed; I saw no attempt to rape her. I have rewatched the ending...the guy does not climb into bed with her either. Bosley John Bosley ( talk) 17:15, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
What does "Joe lubricates in front of the body" mean? Like, she becomes aroused, turned on? That's a more usual way of putting it than "lubricates", "lubricates" is a transitive verb! 188.29.164.127 ( talk) 02:40, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
Where is it set? Jim Michael ( talk) 09:40, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
" K (Jamie Bell), a sadist who violently assaults women seeking his company."
This is incorrect. The women aren't 'seeking his company' - they are masochists, seeking exactly what he does to them.
MarkinBoston ( talk) 17:03, 23 September 2019 (UTC)