 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
More than half of the references are from another Wiki which is unacceptable per WP:USERG. Some of the references simply say "See Chapter Two in DiValerio" but that isn't a valid format or even helpful information. This article is terribly referenced and needs improvement. 65.28.236.17 ( talk) 00:44, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
Feel free to jump in and clean up the references. It would be a great service to us all. AD64 ( talk) 15:58, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
Pinging @
Skyerise to avoid an edit war. While the lead indeed repeats the body's key facts, it does so in an extremely editorializing way, with wordings such as stands as a testament to the dynamic nature of Tibetan Buddhism
, fearless embrace of unconventional practices
or inspire understanding of spiritual growth towards greater self-awareness and enlightenment
. This is not the kind of NPOV wording expected of an encyclopedic lead.
Chaotıċ Enby (
talk ·
contribs)
21:44, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- So, copyedit it?
Skyerise (
talk)
21:48, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Done. To be fair, I do not wish to offend, but I am surprised that an experienced editor such as yourself would write something that editorializing without copyediting it before.
Chaotıċ Enby (
talk ·
contribs)
22:42, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- That's fair. Must have been having an off day... Still, improvement is usually better than removal. Skyerise ( talk) 12:16, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Done. To be fair, I do not wish to offend, but I am surprised that an experienced editor such as yourself would write something that editorializing without copyediting it before.
Chaotıċ Enby (
talk ·
contribs)
22:42, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
|
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
More than half of the references are from another Wiki which is unacceptable per WP:USERG. Some of the references simply say "See Chapter Two in DiValerio" but that isn't a valid format or even helpful information. This article is terribly referenced and needs improvement. 65.28.236.17 ( talk) 00:44, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
Feel free to jump in and clean up the references. It would be a great service to us all. AD64 ( talk) 15:58, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
Pinging @
Skyerise to avoid an edit war. While the lead indeed repeats the body's key facts, it does so in an extremely editorializing way, with wordings such as stands as a testament to the dynamic nature of Tibetan Buddhism
, fearless embrace of unconventional practices
or inspire understanding of spiritual growth towards greater self-awareness and enlightenment
. This is not the kind of NPOV wording expected of an encyclopedic lead.
Chaotıċ Enby (
talk ·
contribs)
21:44, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- So, copyedit it?
Skyerise (
talk)
21:48, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Done. To be fair, I do not wish to offend, but I am surprised that an experienced editor such as yourself would write something that editorializing without copyediting it before.
Chaotıċ Enby (
talk ·
contribs)
22:42, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- That's fair. Must have been having an off day... Still, improvement is usually better than removal. Skyerise ( talk) 12:16, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Done. To be fair, I do not wish to offend, but I am surprised that an experienced editor such as yourself would write something that editorializing without copyediting it before.
Chaotıċ Enby (
talk ·
contribs)
22:42, 24 May 2024 (UTC)