![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
There are quite some interesting research reactors in Belgium which are worth mentioning. Perhaps a part about the delivery of uranium for the Manhattan project in exchange for intelligence about peaceful nuclear power. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MCvarial ( talk • contribs) 18:52, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
There is a discussion which is also related to this article or category. You are welcome to take a part of this discussion. Beagel ( talk) 15:31, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
There appears to be a bit of an battle over the section about FANC, nuclear watchdog. I already undertook one attempt in the past to reword the paragraphs by User:J.T.W.A.Cornelisse . Because i judged they were too opinionated. I believe the core point remarking some of the problems at FANC are valid and worth noting. Equally, I think that perhaps there are too many words, and only the essence should be in this article. If there is enough to say about FANC it should have it's own page. But i believe there once was, and it was removed for not being noteworthy enough. Pinfix ( talk) 16:15, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 22:22, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
There are quite some interesting research reactors in Belgium which are worth mentioning. Perhaps a part about the delivery of uranium for the Manhattan project in exchange for intelligence about peaceful nuclear power. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MCvarial ( talk • contribs) 18:52, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
There is a discussion which is also related to this article or category. You are welcome to take a part of this discussion. Beagel ( talk) 15:31, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
There appears to be a bit of an battle over the section about FANC, nuclear watchdog. I already undertook one attempt in the past to reword the paragraphs by User:J.T.W.A.Cornelisse . Because i judged they were too opinionated. I believe the core point remarking some of the problems at FANC are valid and worth noting. Equally, I think that perhaps there are too many words, and only the essence should be in this article. If there is enough to say about FANC it should have it's own page. But i believe there once was, and it was removed for not being noteworthy enough. Pinfix ( talk) 16:15, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 22:22, 14 June 2019 (UTC)