![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Removed {{prod}} tag as bad faith/poorly-researched nomination. Company is of considerable size and notability, and is one of the largest energy suppliers in the UK, as evidenced by links to business data. Yes, the article is still in need of vast improvement, but it's not proddable. ~ Matticus78 15:06, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
In favour. Rnestle 18:23, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
See also [npower UK http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Npower_(UK)] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.168.93.82 ( talk) 15:56, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
I have deleted the following due to lack of context. Perhaps a section on the topic could be added Pontificake 19:48, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
NPower Attempt to silence the press:
http://www.epuk.org/News/472/npower-injunction-on-epuk-member
Image:Npower logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 16:33, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Hello all,
I've just had a quick look at this article and I'm surprised there's no 'criticism' section ... or any criticism at all! Npower are hated by a lot of people for very good reason! They came bottom of a customer satisfaction survey ran by uSwitch, they tried to pollute a load of lakes in Oxford, they were the last of the big six to drop their fuel prices sparking more criticism. I can reliably source all these points. I was just wondering why no one else had done so?! If no-one objects / points out why I shouldn't then I'll add a section next week! Peace Out! -- LookingYourBest ( talk) 05:34, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Removed {{prod}} tag as bad faith/poorly-researched nomination. Company is of considerable size and notability, and is one of the largest energy suppliers in the UK, as evidenced by links to business data. Yes, the article is still in need of vast improvement, but it's not proddable. ~ Matticus78 15:06, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
In favour. Rnestle 18:23, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
See also [npower UK http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Npower_(UK)] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.168.93.82 ( talk) 15:56, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
I have deleted the following due to lack of context. Perhaps a section on the topic could be added Pontificake 19:48, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
NPower Attempt to silence the press:
http://www.epuk.org/News/472/npower-injunction-on-epuk-member
Image:Npower logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 16:33, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Hello all,
I've just had a quick look at this article and I'm surprised there's no 'criticism' section ... or any criticism at all! Npower are hated by a lot of people for very good reason! They came bottom of a customer satisfaction survey ran by uSwitch, they tried to pollute a load of lakes in Oxford, they were the last of the big six to drop their fuel prices sparking more criticism. I can reliably source all these points. I was just wondering why no one else had done so?! If no-one objects / points out why I shouldn't then I'll add a section next week! Peace Out! -- LookingYourBest ( talk) 05:34, 27 March 2009 (UTC)