Text and/or other creative content from this version of nCoV was copied or moved into novel coronavirus with this edit on 30 January 2020. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

This article has been mentioned by a media organization: Mikael Thalen (24 March 2020). "Meet the Wikipedia editors fighting to keep coronavirus pages accurate". The Daily Dot. Retrieved 1 April 2020. In the final days of January 2020, Dekimasu, a professor who confirmed his identity to the Daily Dot but asked to remain anonymous, began helping populate the Wikipedia page for the emerging "Novel coronavirus."

This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Viruses Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Viruses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of viruses on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirusesWikipedia:WikiProject VirusesTemplate:WikiProject Virusesvirus articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article. Medicine: Emergency / Society / Pulmonology Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Emergency medicine and EMS task force (assessed as Mid-importance). This article is supported by the Society and Medicine task force. This article is supported by the Pulmonology task force (assessed as Mid-importance). An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article. COVID-19 Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject COVID-19, a project to coordinate efforts to improve all COVID-19-related articles. If you would like to help, you are invited to join and to participate in project discussions.COVID-19Wikipedia:WikiProject COVID-19Template:WikiProject COVID-19COVID-19 articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Can you please confirm whether Novel coronavirus 2012 and hCoV-EMC are actually two different viruses or not? Thanks.
Bwrs ( talk) 15:46, 27 February 2013 (UTC) reply

I'd guess 9 out of 10 users finding this page are seeking 2019-nCoV. Landing on this entry could be confusing. Could we temporarily place an About template entry be added pointing those users to that entry?

- Wikmoz ( talk) 20:33, 2 February 2020 (UTC) reply

Going to run with the above. Feel free to improve on it. - Wikmoz ( talk) 07:54, 3 February 2020 (UTC) reply

in this case, 2002 and 2005 initial names need to be researche. currently its most likely wrong. EnTerbury ( talk) 08:48, 2 April 2020 (UTC) reply

I removed the labels 2002-nCoV, 2005-nCoV and 2012-nCoV as I could find no supporting evidence that these terms were used, at the time or recently with the (WHO-recommended) use of 2019-nCoV. 'novel coronavirus 2005' is not found, and so was removed. 'novel coronavirus 2012' is more widely used, and so is kept. I also removed the unsupported statement 'Different species are identified by prepending the year of discovery to the novel coronavirus term "nCoV" '. Using these terms here looks like a (good-faith) attempt to apply order that does not reflect actual usage. I suggest that we discuss here before reinserting those, unless clear references are available. - Onanoff ( talk) 10:10, 10 February 2020 (UTC) reply

The firs SARS-virus and HKU1 are both reffered to as novel coronavirus. But I can't neither find a source that exactly states that these viruses were called 2002-nCoV of 2005-nCoV respectively. I found my sources here 2005 novel coronavirus via google scholar and novel coronavirus 2002 via google scholar. Melvinvk ( talk) 21:46, 24 March 2020 (UTC) reply

why were they reinstated again? I could find a contemporary source for 2012, but 2005 and 2002 dont seem to have been called like that before wikipedia did. id say they should be removed. EnTerbury ( talk) 08:46, 2 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Once again, the invented terms "2002-nCoV", "2005-nCoV" and "2012-nCoV" were inserted here, labelled 'initial names'. There is no evidence for any use of these, and I have removed that column of the table, and adjusted another to 'Other names', alongside the (first-mentioned) official one. Perhaps we should distinguish formal and informal names, but I haven't yet.
This erroneous reintroduction was part of a major revision (including tabulation of the names) by user Special:Contributions/89.206.118.4 (who seems competent and well intentioned, if anonymous) at 12:47, on 11 February 2020‎. Others may wish to review the rest of that edit.
Please look out for any further 'wishful' rationalising of earlier coronavirus terms. - Onanoff ( talk) 15:24, 17 April 2020 (UTC) reply

• https://www.wired.co.uk/article/wikipedia-coronavirus

--- Another Believer _{( Talk)} 20:08, 12 March 2020 (UTC) reply

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Noble corona. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Arthistorian1977 ( talk) 14:16, 19 March 2020 (UTC) reply

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Nobel corona. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Arthistorian1977 ( talk) 14:17, 19 March 2020 (UTC) reply