![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Shouldn't the entensive book descriptions should be split off into their own articles? Jessicapierce 04:36, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
I did it last night. Look for article under book title "
Noughts & Crosses". It's going to need intro material, references and etc. I'm not sure what the WikiCustom is regarding articles devoted to telling an author's idea blow by blow without benefit of the author's own words or skill. Wiki Project "Novel"? Deeply ambivalent about this...
~
Otterpops
19:52, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
Hehe, oh my dear, do you have the gall to chop that thing down though? Someone got very excited about telling every detail of that whole novel(s), they loved that book. You may get resistance. Good luck!
I'm going to move these discussion sections (copies of them) over onto the
Noughts & Crosses discussion page so all bold souls have some sense of what's going on.
~
Otterpops
14:37, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
The Knife Edge section is really not looking too good, very uninformative, and unprofessional. I have cleaned up a few of the typos, and I'm not really sure that "suitable for kids over 12" is an acceptable ending either. Is there anyone who knows the plotline of this book in greater depth, and would be willing to improve the article? I'd do it myself but unfortunately I know very little of the book -- LyraLight 11:27, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
There is a play of the first book performed by the royal shakespeare company on in cardiff on March 19th. Can someone add it to the article? Im not sure where it should go. User:FreemDeem 19:35, 13 March 2008 (edit
"The book Double Cross can be read first, as it doesn't give away too much of the other books and it isn't too difficult to understand."
Article is a bit inconsistent about capitalisation. Do the novels stick to one or the other, if so this should be mentioned in the article and used throughout. John a s ( talk) 22:06, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Shouldn't the entensive book descriptions should be split off into their own articles? Jessicapierce 04:36, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
I did it last night. Look for article under book title "
Noughts & Crosses". It's going to need intro material, references and etc. I'm not sure what the WikiCustom is regarding articles devoted to telling an author's idea blow by blow without benefit of the author's own words or skill. Wiki Project "Novel"? Deeply ambivalent about this...
~
Otterpops
19:52, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
Hehe, oh my dear, do you have the gall to chop that thing down though? Someone got very excited about telling every detail of that whole novel(s), they loved that book. You may get resistance. Good luck!
I'm going to move these discussion sections (copies of them) over onto the
Noughts & Crosses discussion page so all bold souls have some sense of what's going on.
~
Otterpops
14:37, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
The Knife Edge section is really not looking too good, very uninformative, and unprofessional. I have cleaned up a few of the typos, and I'm not really sure that "suitable for kids over 12" is an acceptable ending either. Is there anyone who knows the plotline of this book in greater depth, and would be willing to improve the article? I'd do it myself but unfortunately I know very little of the book -- LyraLight 11:27, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
There is a play of the first book performed by the royal shakespeare company on in cardiff on March 19th. Can someone add it to the article? Im not sure where it should go. User:FreemDeem 19:35, 13 March 2008 (edit
"The book Double Cross can be read first, as it doesn't give away too much of the other books and it isn't too difficult to understand."
Article is a bit inconsistent about capitalisation. Do the novels stick to one or the other, if so this should be mentioned in the article and used throughout. John a s ( talk) 22:06, 5 March 2020 (UTC)