From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Editions

There was no mention of the comprehensive edition of Darrouzès (1981), so I have added that, but then I noticed that the article already included some remarks on earlier editions. Should this not be rationalized into a single section which gives a brief run-down of the textual history as is the case with other articles on works from Antiquity and the Byzantine period? Ajcee7 ( talk) 16:54, 27 February 2011 (UTC) reply

Jerusalem

Does this count as a notitia for jerusalem? It looks like one to me (and looks like the source for the antioch-jerusalem titular part of the provinciale romanum as well). ~~~ 77.205.41.164 ( talk) 19:22, 9 May 2023 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Editions

There was no mention of the comprehensive edition of Darrouzès (1981), so I have added that, but then I noticed that the article already included some remarks on earlier editions. Should this not be rationalized into a single section which gives a brief run-down of the textual history as is the case with other articles on works from Antiquity and the Byzantine period? Ajcee7 ( talk) 16:54, 27 February 2011 (UTC) reply

Jerusalem

Does this count as a notitia for jerusalem? It looks like one to me (and looks like the source for the antioch-jerusalem titular part of the provinciale romanum as well). ~~~ 77.205.41.164 ( talk) 19:22, 9 May 2023 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook