![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The contents of the Antarctic Beech at Comboyne page were merged into Nothofagus moorei on 5 February 2019. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
I have just come back from a property where some 30 of these tree's were logged i can only wonder at there value ?
nothing, now that they are not in the ground. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.215.29.169 ( talk) 03:24, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
In about 1981 I was in a car travelling from Hill End to Bathurst, on the Bridle Trail which goes beside the Macquarie River. West of Hill End there were long stretches of this river with Nothofagus moorei growing, although otherwise the area was cleared for farmland. This is south of Barrington Tops by some distance and appears to be natural distribution [assuming the trees are still there]. Microstrobos ( talk) 01:45, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
We need a few more sources and details of how this tree is used as a ornament. I'm skeptical. - Shiftchange ( talk) 23:59, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
Unwarranted spin off article with too much overlap. Doesn't appear to be an independently noteworthy subpopulation, and proportional discussion of populations should occur at species article for context. --Animalparty! ( talk) 17:44, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
The new genera (Lophozonia, Fuscospora etc.) have not been accepted outside New Zealand. For example, see:
or
https://npgsweb.ars-grin.gov/gringlobal/taxonomydetail.aspx?id=467521
They were New Zealanders, who changed the nomenclature. As Nothofagus exists at least in six countries outside New Zealand (Indonesia, Papua New Guinea, France (New Caledonia), Australia, Chile, Argentina), Nothofagus should still be the genus name in Wikipedia. Thus, all the species articles, at least the species outside New Zealand, should be edited and the old names restored. Probably someone from New Zealand changed the genus names in Wikipedia. Now tree enthusiasts around the world are wondering, what is the valid name. Krasanen ( talk) 17:38, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
References
I have done the fuscosporas. Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 13:24, 17 August 2018 (UTC) Thanks Cas. Gderrin ( talk) 20:49, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The contents of the Antarctic Beech at Comboyne page were merged into Nothofagus moorei on 5 February 2019. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
I have just come back from a property where some 30 of these tree's were logged i can only wonder at there value ?
nothing, now that they are not in the ground. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.215.29.169 ( talk) 03:24, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
In about 1981 I was in a car travelling from Hill End to Bathurst, on the Bridle Trail which goes beside the Macquarie River. West of Hill End there were long stretches of this river with Nothofagus moorei growing, although otherwise the area was cleared for farmland. This is south of Barrington Tops by some distance and appears to be natural distribution [assuming the trees are still there]. Microstrobos ( talk) 01:45, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
We need a few more sources and details of how this tree is used as a ornament. I'm skeptical. - Shiftchange ( talk) 23:59, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
Unwarranted spin off article with too much overlap. Doesn't appear to be an independently noteworthy subpopulation, and proportional discussion of populations should occur at species article for context. --Animalparty! ( talk) 17:44, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
The new genera (Lophozonia, Fuscospora etc.) have not been accepted outside New Zealand. For example, see:
or
https://npgsweb.ars-grin.gov/gringlobal/taxonomydetail.aspx?id=467521
They were New Zealanders, who changed the nomenclature. As Nothofagus exists at least in six countries outside New Zealand (Indonesia, Papua New Guinea, France (New Caledonia), Australia, Chile, Argentina), Nothofagus should still be the genus name in Wikipedia. Thus, all the species articles, at least the species outside New Zealand, should be edited and the old names restored. Probably someone from New Zealand changed the genus names in Wikipedia. Now tree enthusiasts around the world are wondering, what is the valid name. Krasanen ( talk) 17:38, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
References
I have done the fuscosporas. Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 13:24, 17 August 2018 (UTC) Thanks Cas. Gderrin ( talk) 20:49, 17 August 2018 (UTC)