From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ashliveslove ( talk · contribs) 04:50, 6 November 2011 (UTC) reply

    • Dead links found.

Resolve the issue and will make sure it gets a GA ASHU IND 07:27, 6 November 2011 (UTC) reply

Final Analysis

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b ( MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    Not much concerns here. ASHU IND 05:43, 7 November 2011 (UTC) reply
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c ( OR):
    No such concerns here. Article has been searched thoroughly for such references. ASHU IND 05:43, 7 November 2011 (UTC) reply
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    All such aspects have been covered. ASHU IND 05:43, 7 November 2011 (UTC) reply
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
    Fine here.
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    All images are proper till the review date and well captioned. ASHU IND 05:43, 7 November 2011 (UTC) reply
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ashliveslove ( talk · contribs) 04:50, 6 November 2011 (UTC) reply

    • Dead links found.

Resolve the issue and will make sure it gets a GA ASHU IND 07:27, 6 November 2011 (UTC) reply

Final Analysis

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b ( MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    Not much concerns here. ASHU IND 05:43, 7 November 2011 (UTC) reply
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c ( OR):
    No such concerns here. Article has been searched thoroughly for such references. ASHU IND 05:43, 7 November 2011 (UTC) reply
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    All such aspects have been covered. ASHU IND 05:43, 7 November 2011 (UTC) reply
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
    Fine here.
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    All images are proper till the review date and well captioned. ASHU IND 05:43, 7 November 2011 (UTC) reply
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook