From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer:
Ashliveslove (
talk ·
contribs)
04:50, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
reply
Resolve the issue and will make sure it gets a GA
ASHU
IND
07:27, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
reply
Final Analysis
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (
MoS for
lead,
layout,
word choice,
fiction, and
lists):
- Not much concerns here.
ASHU
IND
05:43, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
reply
- It is factually accurate and
verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to
reliable sources):
c (
OR):
- No such concerns here. Article has been searched thoroughly for such references.
ASHU
IND
05:43, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
reply
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- All such aspects have been covered.
ASHU
IND
05:43, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
reply
- It follows the
neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fine here.
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by
images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have
fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with
suitable captions):
- All images are proper till the review date and well captioned.
ASHU
IND
05:43, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
reply
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail: