This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Nose Hill Park article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Possibly include more details about the city's fight against possible development? The city went to the supreme court of Canada to resolve the issue. It shows the park was a long time coming. Hartel Holdings Co. Ltd. v. City of Calgary, 1984 CanLII 137 (SCC), [1984] 1 SCR 337, < http://canlii.ca/t/1xv20>. -- Sometimesthinking ( talk) 00:24, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
Some of this article seems to be lifted from here. TastyCakes ( talk) 16:37, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Nose Hill Park article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Possibly include more details about the city's fight against possible development? The city went to the supreme court of Canada to resolve the issue. It shows the park was a long time coming. Hartel Holdings Co. Ltd. v. City of Calgary, 1984 CanLII 137 (SCC), [1984] 1 SCR 337, < http://canlii.ca/t/1xv20>. -- Sometimesthinking ( talk) 00:24, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
Some of this article seems to be lifted from here. TastyCakes ( talk) 16:37, 28 January 2009 (UTC)