Norwich and Worcester Railroad has been listed as one of the
Engineering and technology good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: February 6, 2023. ( Reviewed version). |
A fact from Norwich and Worcester Railroad appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 8 February 2023 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The result was: promoted by
Cielquiparle (
talk)
16:08, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
Created by Trainsandotherthings ( talk). Self-nominated at 16:27, 23 January 2023 (UTC).
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: LunaEatsTuna ( talk · contribs) 22:39, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Earwig says good to go. No concerns from me either.
All images are relevant, of acceptable quality, and copyright-free:
File:West portal detail of Taft Tunnel, December 2017.JPG
: CC-BY-SA 3.0;File:1859 Norwich and Worcester Line advertisement.jpg
: valid public domain rationale;File:Plainfield station postcard.jpg
: valid public domain rationale;File:Aerial view of the US Naval Submarine Base New London c1990.jpg
: valid public domain rationale;File:Putnam station from parking lot (1), October 2020.jpg
: CC-BY-SA 4.0;File:Norwich station, December 2018.JPG
: CC-BY-SA 3.0;File:Gales Ferry station postcard.jpg
: valid public domain rationale.All sources are RS. Spotcheck—no concerns with refs 1, 11, 12, 15 or 21. But for ref 24 b:
Formatting:
Infobox, short desc, WP:ALT text, navs, other templates and cats good.
Norwich and Worcester Railroad has been listed as one of the
Engineering and technology good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: February 6, 2023. ( Reviewed version). |
A fact from Norwich and Worcester Railroad appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 8 February 2023 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The result was: promoted by
Cielquiparle (
talk)
16:08, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
Created by Trainsandotherthings ( talk). Self-nominated at 16:27, 23 January 2023 (UTC).
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: LunaEatsTuna ( talk · contribs) 22:39, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Earwig says good to go. No concerns from me either.
All images are relevant, of acceptable quality, and copyright-free:
File:West portal detail of Taft Tunnel, December 2017.JPG
: CC-BY-SA 3.0;File:1859 Norwich and Worcester Line advertisement.jpg
: valid public domain rationale;File:Plainfield station postcard.jpg
: valid public domain rationale;File:Aerial view of the US Naval Submarine Base New London c1990.jpg
: valid public domain rationale;File:Putnam station from parking lot (1), October 2020.jpg
: CC-BY-SA 4.0;File:Norwich station, December 2018.JPG
: CC-BY-SA 3.0;File:Gales Ferry station postcard.jpg
: valid public domain rationale.All sources are RS. Spotcheck—no concerns with refs 1, 11, 12, 15 or 21. But for ref 24 b:
Formatting:
Infobox, short desc, WP:ALT text, navs, other templates and cats good.