This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It has been suggested to me that this article should be split into 2 seperate ones for Midsomer Norton & Radstock - as they do have seperate identities (even though growing ever closer together) & it is only because of local authority boundaries that they are joined together. Any Thoughts?— Rod talk 09:32, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
I'm the person who suggested this on Rod's talk page. Most places, even quite tiny places, have their own article, and Midsomer Norton and Radstock are separate though adjoining places, and not tiny. Norton Radstock deserves an entry as a local government entity, but the two towns have their own names and should have their own articles. Clandown has a separate article and that's both smaller and, arguably, less a distinct place. Johnlp 21:13, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
I suggest merging the Clandown article into this one as it is unlikely to be large enough by itself.— Rod talk 16:49, 30 November 2008 (UTC) Have wriiten a number of points for consideration by yourself, & thought I'd save them ?! Have I ? John Gibson (ja_gibson@tiscali.co.uk —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.76.233.50 ( talk) 10:46, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
I just reverted a change which involved this article being blanked and redirected to Norton-Radstock. First of all copy/paste is not the way to handle changes to article names, it should be moved using the "move" tab. Secondly, the hyphen is not used by either of the official bodies that govern the town(s). Search for the settlement on http://www.bathnes.gov.uk and you will see that no hyphen is used e.g. this press release. Nor is it used by the town council. Any move of this article to Norton-Radstock should be discussed first and consensus should be reached. -- TimTay ( talk) 08:50, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Norton Radstock. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:52, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It has been suggested to me that this article should be split into 2 seperate ones for Midsomer Norton & Radstock - as they do have seperate identities (even though growing ever closer together) & it is only because of local authority boundaries that they are joined together. Any Thoughts?— Rod talk 09:32, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
I'm the person who suggested this on Rod's talk page. Most places, even quite tiny places, have their own article, and Midsomer Norton and Radstock are separate though adjoining places, and not tiny. Norton Radstock deserves an entry as a local government entity, but the two towns have their own names and should have their own articles. Clandown has a separate article and that's both smaller and, arguably, less a distinct place. Johnlp 21:13, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
I suggest merging the Clandown article into this one as it is unlikely to be large enough by itself.— Rod talk 16:49, 30 November 2008 (UTC) Have wriiten a number of points for consideration by yourself, & thought I'd save them ?! Have I ? John Gibson (ja_gibson@tiscali.co.uk —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.76.233.50 ( talk) 10:46, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
I just reverted a change which involved this article being blanked and redirected to Norton-Radstock. First of all copy/paste is not the way to handle changes to article names, it should be moved using the "move" tab. Secondly, the hyphen is not used by either of the official bodies that govern the town(s). Search for the settlement on http://www.bathnes.gov.uk and you will see that no hyphen is used e.g. this press release. Nor is it used by the town council. Any move of this article to Norton-Radstock should be discussed first and consensus should be reached. -- TimTay ( talk) 08:50, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Norton Radstock. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:52, 29 November 2017 (UTC)