![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 22 March 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
When referencing the facts of public opinion on software it's really hard to achieve this with any individual source that passes WP:RS. So I can quite see why a couple of IP only users have removed the following item:
Users appear to be unaware that the utility has downloaded until asked to run it, and complaints are appearing on support forums globally.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.google.co.uk/search?num=100&hl=en&newwindow=1&safe=off&rlz=1C1GGLS_enGB291&q='norton+PC+Checkup'&btnG=Search&meta= |title=Google search for 'Norton PC Checkup' |accessdate=2008-10-25}}</ref>
One needs to ask "at what point does an overwhelming number of Ghits on non accredited sources, one of which includes a support forum on Adobe's website, become sufficient to pass muster?
Since it has been deleted from the article without a full explanation I am putting it back in for the moment. Frankly I's also prefer a better quality formal reference, too. Fiddle Faddle ( talk) 09:47, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 22 March 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
When referencing the facts of public opinion on software it's really hard to achieve this with any individual source that passes WP:RS. So I can quite see why a couple of IP only users have removed the following item:
Users appear to be unaware that the utility has downloaded until asked to run it, and complaints are appearing on support forums globally.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.google.co.uk/search?num=100&hl=en&newwindow=1&safe=off&rlz=1C1GGLS_enGB291&q='norton+PC+Checkup'&btnG=Search&meta= |title=Google search for 'Norton PC Checkup' |accessdate=2008-10-25}}</ref>
One needs to ask "at what point does an overwhelming number of Ghits on non accredited sources, one of which includes a support forum on Adobe's website, become sufficient to pass muster?
Since it has been deleted from the article without a full explanation I am putting it back in for the moment. Frankly I's also prefer a better quality formal reference, too. Fiddle Faddle ( talk) 09:47, 14 November 2008 (UTC)