![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I'm curious as to why the "Arms" and "Speed enforcement" sections have images clearly lifted from the internet and not specifically relevant to the NT Police. For instance, the pictures of the AR-15's and Taser are not the types used by the NT Police, while the radar andlidar images are those taken from internet sites that have such items for sale etc.
I'm also wondering why the NT Police pages needs to list EVERY section within the Force without expanding on any information about said secion, where other State/Territory pages on Wiki only list major units/sections that have a bit of history/info etc. Seems uneeded and messy in its current layout/format.
--- —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.170.197.8 ( talk) 05:48, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
I have deleted this section. No other police article I could find included a list of people shot, much less one focused on a single race of people. There are category pages that list notable instances ( Category:Deaths in police custody in Australia, Category:People shot dead by law enforcement officers in Australia, Category:Deaths by firearm in the Northern Territory) and a general page on Aboriginal deaths in custody. See Wikipedia:BALASP. VisitingSamG ( talk) 12:48, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
The title of this section may lead to an assumption that all of the incidents listed were not justified or ruled a crime, I suggest deleting the section and adding the massicares and other unjustifiable incidents to the controversies section. Another option is to rename the section and/or add a sentence before the list to clarafy both illegal and justified acts are included.
I understand it's a touchy subject for some and people may have opinions on what was and wasn't murder or justified, but the article needs to adhere to rules of neutrality. SNITZ01 ( talk) 11:49, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
Considering removing former rank structs from the ranks selection, they're historically interesting but may be better left in Australian police ranks article. SNITZ01 ( talk) 11:51, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I'm curious as to why the "Arms" and "Speed enforcement" sections have images clearly lifted from the internet and not specifically relevant to the NT Police. For instance, the pictures of the AR-15's and Taser are not the types used by the NT Police, while the radar andlidar images are those taken from internet sites that have such items for sale etc.
I'm also wondering why the NT Police pages needs to list EVERY section within the Force without expanding on any information about said secion, where other State/Territory pages on Wiki only list major units/sections that have a bit of history/info etc. Seems uneeded and messy in its current layout/format.
--- —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.170.197.8 ( talk) 05:48, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
I have deleted this section. No other police article I could find included a list of people shot, much less one focused on a single race of people. There are category pages that list notable instances ( Category:Deaths in police custody in Australia, Category:People shot dead by law enforcement officers in Australia, Category:Deaths by firearm in the Northern Territory) and a general page on Aboriginal deaths in custody. See Wikipedia:BALASP. VisitingSamG ( talk) 12:48, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
The title of this section may lead to an assumption that all of the incidents listed were not justified or ruled a crime, I suggest deleting the section and adding the massicares and other unjustifiable incidents to the controversies section. Another option is to rename the section and/or add a sentence before the list to clarafy both illegal and justified acts are included.
I understand it's a touchy subject for some and people may have opinions on what was and wasn't murder or justified, but the article needs to adhere to rules of neutrality. SNITZ01 ( talk) 11:49, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
Considering removing former rank structs from the ranks selection, they're historically interesting but may be better left in Australian police ranks article. SNITZ01 ( talk) 11:51, 11 November 2022 (UTC)