This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Northern Aleppo offensive (February 2016) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
WARNING: ACTIVE COMMUNITY SANCTIONS The article Northern Aleppo offensive (February 2016), along with other pages relating to the Syrian Civil War and ISIL, is designated by the community as a contentious topic. The current restrictions are:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be sanctioned.
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
All of the sources mentioned in this article (and all other that I've seen) mention the rebel factions during this conflict to be Jabhat Al-Nusra, Harakat Ahrar Al-Sham, Harakat Nouriddeen Al-Zinki, and Jaysh Al-Mujahiddeen (they mostly mention al-Nusra), and none of them refer to the Free Syrian Army. Although it seems the Free Syrian Army was involved in the siege initially, apparently it was not a major group in this conflict. -- Z 09:08, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
al Masdar is the source used to report the death of the child soldier. It is a strongly pro-assad source. Should it really be trusted on a matter like that, if no other media reports it? 108.28.192.131 ( talk) 15:12, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
They have the old Syria flag and supposedly are rebels.
172.98.152.102 ( talk) 19:52, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
They are part of Kurdish-led SDF which is nominally neutral towards the Syrian government. EkoGraf ( talk) 03:35, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
I dont want to see the Future, WP is not a Crystalball but a possible Battle for Azaz should deserve its own article or not? Mr.User200 ( talk) 12:41, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Northern Aleppo offensive (February 2016) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
WARNING: ACTIVE COMMUNITY SANCTIONS The article Northern Aleppo offensive (February 2016), along with other pages relating to the Syrian Civil War and ISIL, is designated by the community as a contentious topic. The current restrictions are:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be sanctioned.
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
All of the sources mentioned in this article (and all other that I've seen) mention the rebel factions during this conflict to be Jabhat Al-Nusra, Harakat Ahrar Al-Sham, Harakat Nouriddeen Al-Zinki, and Jaysh Al-Mujahiddeen (they mostly mention al-Nusra), and none of them refer to the Free Syrian Army. Although it seems the Free Syrian Army was involved in the siege initially, apparently it was not a major group in this conflict. -- Z 09:08, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
al Masdar is the source used to report the death of the child soldier. It is a strongly pro-assad source. Should it really be trusted on a matter like that, if no other media reports it? 108.28.192.131 ( talk) 15:12, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
They have the old Syria flag and supposedly are rebels.
172.98.152.102 ( talk) 19:52, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
They are part of Kurdish-led SDF which is nominally neutral towards the Syrian government. EkoGraf ( talk) 03:35, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
I dont want to see the Future, WP is not a Crystalball but a possible Battle for Azaz should deserve its own article or not? Mr.User200 ( talk) 12:41, 18 February 2016 (UTC)