A fact from Northeast Syrtis appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 5 February 2019 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
I think the updated version including more information of this landing sites, but the organization is a little messy. As well, I should focus on the observations of this region instead of many interpretations derived from original researchs, proving more clean, verifiability and effective information to the people who are not familiar with this topic. In my eye, I consider Northeast Syrtis should be the final landing site of Mars 2020 mission. I ought to provide neutral point of view to this landing site even I am frustrated of hearing the News Northeast Syrtis was cut by NASA this morning.
Hi Justin! These are some suggestions for your article:
Cheers,
Ivancyyip (
talk) 06:48, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
Couple things that came to mind:
Hi Justin,
Suggestions:
1. By just looking at the first image is a bit confusing to me. Putting an image showing the satellite image of Mars and the location of NE Syrtis prior to this geophysical map might introduce its location more clearly.
2. In terms of structure, Mars 2020 mission might be put ahead of stratigraphy for a more logical flow since this part tells why everything (including the selection of landing site) is done.
3. It would be more interesting if some geophysical survey data are added to support the features and process observed in the table of “Testable Hypotheses of Northeastern Syrtis”.
4. The table of “Testable Hypotheses of Northeastern Syrtis” might be cited in a more detailed way (if possible).
Regards, Kevin Kevnmh ( talk) 16:40, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
"(1) Isidis-formed melt within Noachian basement, (2) regional olivine-rich unit, (3) dark-toned magic cap rock, (4) Syrtis lava" this is not linked nor explained. Generalist readers may not understand what are they. You may consider explaining some frequently used terms in your paragraph.
- the stratigraphic section used is a good representation but the use of a scale and details of the contacts would be useful. further to this, comparative stratigraphic sections of other regions could help highlight why this site is best
- there use of links to specific wiki pages decreases down the page. in some cases it may be useful to give a brief description of terms, for example the nature of minerals described in the within the regional geology
- sometimes the writing hints at a personal take on the topic which is unlike wikipedia articles. try keep the the phrasing as straight information
- the first two paragraphs of the 'mesa unit' section contain no citations ?
- all the information is very clear and accessible, nice page — Preceding unsigned comment added by Georgealee ( talk • contribs) 14:32, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
A fact from Northeast Syrtis appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 5 February 2019 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
I think the updated version including more information of this landing sites, but the organization is a little messy. As well, I should focus on the observations of this region instead of many interpretations derived from original researchs, proving more clean, verifiability and effective information to the people who are not familiar with this topic. In my eye, I consider Northeast Syrtis should be the final landing site of Mars 2020 mission. I ought to provide neutral point of view to this landing site even I am frustrated of hearing the News Northeast Syrtis was cut by NASA this morning.
Hi Justin! These are some suggestions for your article:
Cheers,
Ivancyyip (
talk) 06:48, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
Couple things that came to mind:
Hi Justin,
Suggestions:
1. By just looking at the first image is a bit confusing to me. Putting an image showing the satellite image of Mars and the location of NE Syrtis prior to this geophysical map might introduce its location more clearly.
2. In terms of structure, Mars 2020 mission might be put ahead of stratigraphy for a more logical flow since this part tells why everything (including the selection of landing site) is done.
3. It would be more interesting if some geophysical survey data are added to support the features and process observed in the table of “Testable Hypotheses of Northeastern Syrtis”.
4. The table of “Testable Hypotheses of Northeastern Syrtis” might be cited in a more detailed way (if possible).
Regards, Kevin Kevnmh ( talk) 16:40, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
"(1) Isidis-formed melt within Noachian basement, (2) regional olivine-rich unit, (3) dark-toned magic cap rock, (4) Syrtis lava" this is not linked nor explained. Generalist readers may not understand what are they. You may consider explaining some frequently used terms in your paragraph.
- the stratigraphic section used is a good representation but the use of a scale and details of the contacts would be useful. further to this, comparative stratigraphic sections of other regions could help highlight why this site is best
- there use of links to specific wiki pages decreases down the page. in some cases it may be useful to give a brief description of terms, for example the nature of minerals described in the within the regional geology
- sometimes the writing hints at a personal take on the topic which is unlike wikipedia articles. try keep the the phrasing as straight information
- the first two paragraphs of the 'mesa unit' section contain no citations ?
- all the information is very clear and accessible, nice page — Preceding unsigned comment added by Georgealee ( talk • contribs) 14:32, 20 November 2018 (UTC)