From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Images

There are images on Flickr for this building that might usable here at WP:

Each of these individuals has multiple images of this building in their photostream. -- 208.81.184.4 ( talk) 17:35, 19 October 2011 (UTC) reply

Unfortunately both these image do not qualify for upload to Wikipedia. As an existing structure the image must be "Freely" licensed. One is "All rights reserved" (ie ©) and the other is Some rights reserved (CC-BY-ND). Both are not " NOT OK" per commons/Wikipedia rules. I will e-mailed the posters seeking permission, which I do for temple image, but I do not always get a response. About 40% respond with half saying yes. I will let you know. I would guess that we have a chance with the first image, but not the second. James Jordan is a personal photographer and I have NEVER had one say yes. They always want money which is why he tagged it (CC-BY-ND). -- ARTEST4ECHO ( talk/ contribs) 18:13, 19 October 2011 (UTC) reply
I just noticed that the photographer on the first image specifically says she will not grant permission for any use. I will try James Jordan but I doubt he will say yes.-- ARTEST4ECHO ( talk/ contribs) 18:26, 19 October 2011 (UTC) reply
Darn. Thanks for looking at this, it's just too bad that this looks like it's not going to work out. -- 208.81.184.4 ( talk) 14:04, 20 October 2011 (UTC) reply
Got an e-mail from James Jordan, he said no. He dosn't want to give permission for "commercial" use, which is required for commons. Thanks for looking though. I will try and find something also. -- ARTEST4ECHO ( talk/ contribs) 12:51, 21 October 2011 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Images

There are images on Flickr for this building that might usable here at WP:

Each of these individuals has multiple images of this building in their photostream. -- 208.81.184.4 ( talk) 17:35, 19 October 2011 (UTC) reply

Unfortunately both these image do not qualify for upload to Wikipedia. As an existing structure the image must be "Freely" licensed. One is "All rights reserved" (ie ©) and the other is Some rights reserved (CC-BY-ND). Both are not " NOT OK" per commons/Wikipedia rules. I will e-mailed the posters seeking permission, which I do for temple image, but I do not always get a response. About 40% respond with half saying yes. I will let you know. I would guess that we have a chance with the first image, but not the second. James Jordan is a personal photographer and I have NEVER had one say yes. They always want money which is why he tagged it (CC-BY-ND). -- ARTEST4ECHO ( talk/ contribs) 18:13, 19 October 2011 (UTC) reply
I just noticed that the photographer on the first image specifically says she will not grant permission for any use. I will try James Jordan but I doubt he will say yes.-- ARTEST4ECHO ( talk/ contribs) 18:26, 19 October 2011 (UTC) reply
Darn. Thanks for looking at this, it's just too bad that this looks like it's not going to work out. -- 208.81.184.4 ( talk) 14:04, 20 October 2011 (UTC) reply
Got an e-mail from James Jordan, he said no. He dosn't want to give permission for "commercial" use, which is required for commons. Thanks for looking though. I will try and find something also. -- ARTEST4ECHO ( talk/ contribs) 12:51, 21 October 2011 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook