This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
anyone known when they started to give names, not numbers, to cyclones in India and when? Kanga-Kucha
There was Tropical Storm Aurora in 1983 as well, Hink, but it is unknown why that storm was named. 76.235.214.247 ( talk) 23:35, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
Just so we can start the debate, how far back should it go? Is the current format acceptable? I personally thought that this basin deserves its own seasonal articles, so this is what I did. Comments, questions, additions, corrections? Hurricanehink 02:28, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
Hiya. A couple things:
Jdorje 20:04, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
If it is all right, I am going to make a Pre-1980 North Indian cyclon seasons article. This could cover all the important cyclones in that period. Hurricanehink 14:55, 6 November 2005 (UTC)
Woohoo, it's done! That was really fast, but worth it as the 2nd finished basin. What basin will be finished next??? Hurricanehink 02:54, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
Why is this article categorized as a "disambiguation" class ?
HERB
00:46, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
I was just wondering, since they're so rare, is there anyway of creating a list or category of Arabian Sea Cyclones? Because, it can get confusing and annoying when I try to research them. I always thought that Arabian Sea storms should be some what seperated from the Bay of Bengal.-- UltimateDarkloid ( talk) 14:34, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
No, they shouldn't be. The reason why is because the Arabian Sea and Bay of Bengal both make up the same basin. In other words, the North Indian Ocean is made up of 2 different bodies of water, so they shouldn't be seperated. Besides, the Arabian Sea isn't always less active than the Bay of Bengal. The seas alternate between activity each season; sometimes the Arabian Sea is more active, and sometimes (though most of the time) the Bay of Bengal is more active .No 2 seasons are exactly alike. There is no "2008 Arabian Sea cyclone season" or "2008 Bay of Bengal cyclone season", because they both have to make up one season because usually, if the Bay of Bengal is active, the Arabian Sea has nothing, and vise versa. 76.235.205.44 ( talk) 23:59, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
Why does the IMD use their names sequintially? Why don't they have our kind of list in which the names rotate, or the west Pacific list in which it has no schedule? It just confuses me because it's like retiring an entire list of names each year, whether or not they are signifigant. Why do they have sequential lists? 99.52.153.15 ( talk) 03:44, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
It's a waste of names though, so shouldn't they have a list like the West Pacific, when it starts then goes on endlessly? We won't get a ton of retired names, for real, because storms like 2008's Nargis are rare, and if Nargis was on the West Pacific list, then if it is retired, the replacement name doesn't have to be an "N" name. 99.52.153.15 ( talk) 12:39, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
Why doesn't the IMD retire names after seasons like us? Or do they? I think they should retire names if the storm is notable enough. Why don't they retire names? 76.235.205.44 ( talk) 23:34, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
This region has had some of the world's deadliest cyclones, but there is a shortage of organized information about them. Only cyclones which caused fatalities over 3000 people have been included.
That image i added was RANDOM..? WTF.? -- Anirudh Emani ( talk) 05:24, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Till 2013, unlike other RSMCs, IMD used to classify depressions forming over land as Land Depressions, designating them with their respective storm number with the prefix LAND. However, from this year, they no longer include Land Depressions in the basin. Land depressions are reported in the All India Weather report as a "Salient Weather Feature". The systems are no longer provided any classifications. Warnings are given in the IMD regional websites.
My question is that till now we have been adding Land Depressions in the storm page with their classifcation as per IMD. But from now on, what can we do to include them.
I have three options in mind:
I would like to go with option 2. Please share your views. Rishabh Tatiraju ( talk) 15:44, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
I agree with option 2. It works best IMO. ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk) 20:34, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
I just wanted to ask why the current infobox templates are not used in season articles. Usually we do that in all the other basins when a storm is active... Damien4794 ( talk) 06:29, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
♫ Hurricanehink ( talk) 16:19, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
The following North Indian Ocean cyclone seasons from 1960 onward lack articles:
So, they don't have articles, and I was wondering if someone could create them. Thanks a lot, 🐔 Chic dat Chicken Database 10:58, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Can I add the tropical cyclone classification of IMD, like they have given the Typhoon article? Bera niladri19 🌀🌀 06:56, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Pre-1980 North Indian Ocean cyclone seasons. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 18#Pre-1980 North Indian Ocean cyclone seasons until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Colonies Chris ( talk) 16:53, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Is there any category of adding cyclones? Cyclones like Cyclone Fani has not been listed. -- Jnanaranjan Sahu (ଜ୍ଞାନ) talk 12:44, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
anyone known when they started to give names, not numbers, to cyclones in India and when? Kanga-Kucha
There was Tropical Storm Aurora in 1983 as well, Hink, but it is unknown why that storm was named. 76.235.214.247 ( talk) 23:35, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
Just so we can start the debate, how far back should it go? Is the current format acceptable? I personally thought that this basin deserves its own seasonal articles, so this is what I did. Comments, questions, additions, corrections? Hurricanehink 02:28, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
Hiya. A couple things:
Jdorje 20:04, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
If it is all right, I am going to make a Pre-1980 North Indian cyclon seasons article. This could cover all the important cyclones in that period. Hurricanehink 14:55, 6 November 2005 (UTC)
Woohoo, it's done! That was really fast, but worth it as the 2nd finished basin. What basin will be finished next??? Hurricanehink 02:54, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
Why is this article categorized as a "disambiguation" class ?
HERB
00:46, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
I was just wondering, since they're so rare, is there anyway of creating a list or category of Arabian Sea Cyclones? Because, it can get confusing and annoying when I try to research them. I always thought that Arabian Sea storms should be some what seperated from the Bay of Bengal.-- UltimateDarkloid ( talk) 14:34, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
No, they shouldn't be. The reason why is because the Arabian Sea and Bay of Bengal both make up the same basin. In other words, the North Indian Ocean is made up of 2 different bodies of water, so they shouldn't be seperated. Besides, the Arabian Sea isn't always less active than the Bay of Bengal. The seas alternate between activity each season; sometimes the Arabian Sea is more active, and sometimes (though most of the time) the Bay of Bengal is more active .No 2 seasons are exactly alike. There is no "2008 Arabian Sea cyclone season" or "2008 Bay of Bengal cyclone season", because they both have to make up one season because usually, if the Bay of Bengal is active, the Arabian Sea has nothing, and vise versa. 76.235.205.44 ( talk) 23:59, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
Why does the IMD use their names sequintially? Why don't they have our kind of list in which the names rotate, or the west Pacific list in which it has no schedule? It just confuses me because it's like retiring an entire list of names each year, whether or not they are signifigant. Why do they have sequential lists? 99.52.153.15 ( talk) 03:44, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
It's a waste of names though, so shouldn't they have a list like the West Pacific, when it starts then goes on endlessly? We won't get a ton of retired names, for real, because storms like 2008's Nargis are rare, and if Nargis was on the West Pacific list, then if it is retired, the replacement name doesn't have to be an "N" name. 99.52.153.15 ( talk) 12:39, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
Why doesn't the IMD retire names after seasons like us? Or do they? I think they should retire names if the storm is notable enough. Why don't they retire names? 76.235.205.44 ( talk) 23:34, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
This region has had some of the world's deadliest cyclones, but there is a shortage of organized information about them. Only cyclones which caused fatalities over 3000 people have been included.
That image i added was RANDOM..? WTF.? -- Anirudh Emani ( talk) 05:24, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Till 2013, unlike other RSMCs, IMD used to classify depressions forming over land as Land Depressions, designating them with their respective storm number with the prefix LAND. However, from this year, they no longer include Land Depressions in the basin. Land depressions are reported in the All India Weather report as a "Salient Weather Feature". The systems are no longer provided any classifications. Warnings are given in the IMD regional websites.
My question is that till now we have been adding Land Depressions in the storm page with their classifcation as per IMD. But from now on, what can we do to include them.
I have three options in mind:
I would like to go with option 2. Please share your views. Rishabh Tatiraju ( talk) 15:44, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
I agree with option 2. It works best IMO. ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk) 20:34, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
I just wanted to ask why the current infobox templates are not used in season articles. Usually we do that in all the other basins when a storm is active... Damien4794 ( talk) 06:29, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
♫ Hurricanehink ( talk) 16:19, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
The following North Indian Ocean cyclone seasons from 1960 onward lack articles:
So, they don't have articles, and I was wondering if someone could create them. Thanks a lot, 🐔 Chic dat Chicken Database 10:58, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Can I add the tropical cyclone classification of IMD, like they have given the Typhoon article? Bera niladri19 🌀🌀 06:56, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Pre-1980 North Indian Ocean cyclone seasons. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 18#Pre-1980 North Indian Ocean cyclone seasons until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Colonies Chris ( talk) 16:53, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Is there any category of adding cyclones? Cyclones like Cyclone Fani has not been listed. -- Jnanaranjan Sahu (ଜ୍ଞାନ) talk 12:44, 24 May 2021 (UTC)