![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I have always wondered why this bomber was considered as an alternative to B-25 and B-26 although it would have had the capabilities to replace the B-17 and B-24 in their strategic roles over Europe. Is no source available hat mentions this? Lastdingo ( talk) 23:18, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
I have removed the name "Dragon" from the text because there is no evidence that such a name was ever assigned to the aircraft and (as explained) three good reasons why it would not have been. LowObservable ( talk) 20:33, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I have always wondered why this bomber was considered as an alternative to B-25 and B-26 although it would have had the capabilities to replace the B-17 and B-24 in their strategic roles over Europe. Is no source available hat mentions this? Lastdingo ( talk) 23:18, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
I have removed the name "Dragon" from the text because there is no evidence that such a name was ever assigned to the aircraft and (as explained) three good reasons why it would not have been. LowObservable ( talk) 20:33, 5 June 2024 (UTC)