This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Material from NASDAQ OMX Commodities Europe was split to Nord Pool Spot on 13 June 2010. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted so long as the latter page exists. Please leave this template in place to link the article histories and preserve this attribution. The former page's talk page can be accessed at Talk:NASDAQ OMX Commodities Europe. |
For some reason the part concerning the the effect the current system of trading power has on prices for the consumers was removed completely. "Factual mistakes" was the reason stated. Can we get a discussion going about what was actually wrong. I put the part back, and just would like input on what exactly was wrong and what can be changed to make it more acceptable for everyone. I think the role of Nord Pool in deciding the price for the end-users of the electricity traded deserves a place in the article.
The section that you reinstated looks very much like an ill-informed POV piece from some discussion board. Bold negative statements like "Vattenfall, Statkraft and Fortum, are by law required to sell the power produced to Nord Pool" and "The outgoing price that Nord Pool sets is determined by the "last and most expensive kWh"" need to to cite sources, which will be hard to do since they are in fact, not true. -- Frohrstrand ( talk) 13:40, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
Large part of the text seems to be copied from the Nord Pool website. Needs to be rewritten. Beagel ( talk) 14:31, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
The ownership structure has changed, needs to be updated. Beagel ( talk) 14:31, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
I think it was Lars Galtung who made the changes and added the copied texts. I think he himself is a company representative, so would that make it a copyright issue? If I read the "edit page history" correctly, I think he added the copied paragraphs. /Jaakka 2008-03-04
The ownership change was just a correction of an error. Fortum was listed as one of the owners and they have never owned any part of Nord Pool. Fingrid, which was not listed is however an owner so i assumed this was a case of mistaken identity and corrected it. -- Frohrstrand ( talk) 13:29, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: move. Dpmuk ( talk) 22:54, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
Nord Pool →
NASDAQ OMX Commodities Europe — After acquisition by NASDAQ OMX, Nord Pool changed its name and adapted trading name NASDAQ OMX Commodities Europe. After this change, name Nord Pool is not used anymore by this company and it refers only to Nord Pool Spot, which is separate legal entity owned by different owners.
Beagel (
talk) 11:05, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Nord Pool AS which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 15:47, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Material from NASDAQ OMX Commodities Europe was split to Nord Pool Spot on 13 June 2010. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted so long as the latter page exists. Please leave this template in place to link the article histories and preserve this attribution. The former page's talk page can be accessed at Talk:NASDAQ OMX Commodities Europe. |
For some reason the part concerning the the effect the current system of trading power has on prices for the consumers was removed completely. "Factual mistakes" was the reason stated. Can we get a discussion going about what was actually wrong. I put the part back, and just would like input on what exactly was wrong and what can be changed to make it more acceptable for everyone. I think the role of Nord Pool in deciding the price for the end-users of the electricity traded deserves a place in the article.
The section that you reinstated looks very much like an ill-informed POV piece from some discussion board. Bold negative statements like "Vattenfall, Statkraft and Fortum, are by law required to sell the power produced to Nord Pool" and "The outgoing price that Nord Pool sets is determined by the "last and most expensive kWh"" need to to cite sources, which will be hard to do since they are in fact, not true. -- Frohrstrand ( talk) 13:40, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
Large part of the text seems to be copied from the Nord Pool website. Needs to be rewritten. Beagel ( talk) 14:31, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
The ownership structure has changed, needs to be updated. Beagel ( talk) 14:31, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
I think it was Lars Galtung who made the changes and added the copied texts. I think he himself is a company representative, so would that make it a copyright issue? If I read the "edit page history" correctly, I think he added the copied paragraphs. /Jaakka 2008-03-04
The ownership change was just a correction of an error. Fortum was listed as one of the owners and they have never owned any part of Nord Pool. Fingrid, which was not listed is however an owner so i assumed this was a case of mistaken identity and corrected it. -- Frohrstrand ( talk) 13:29, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: move. Dpmuk ( talk) 22:54, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
Nord Pool →
NASDAQ OMX Commodities Europe — After acquisition by NASDAQ OMX, Nord Pool changed its name and adapted trading name NASDAQ OMX Commodities Europe. After this change, name Nord Pool is not used anymore by this company and it refers only to Nord Pool Spot, which is separate legal entity owned by different owners.
Beagel (
talk) 11:05, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Nord Pool AS which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 15:47, 2 September 2019 (UTC)