![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Athenidas,
Ardaboga. Peer reviewers:
My322.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 05:22, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
What would it be? Malick78 ( talk) 18:08, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
Nooc·ra·cy... Pronunciation: \ˈnō-ə-ˌkrə-sē\ 76.166.208.110 ( talk) 02:46, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
There must be a distinction made here - who used the actual terms, and who applied the concepts? Did Verdansky and Chardin ever use the word "noocracy". We need to be clear about who uses the actual term, and who uses the concept.
Along these lines, is there a philosophical tradition that bears direct continuity between the "noocracy" that Greek philosophers spoke of, and the modern philosophy, especially around the concept of noosphere? This is only vaguely stated, but it is not at all clear.
NittyG ( talk) 17:43, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
It's nessesesary to cite< where greek philosopher use this term -- 85.235.223.114 ( talk) 07:30, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
Surely the concept of a noosphere is contingent upon seeing human thought to be a totality, without distinction or qualitative judgement. An 'existential'. This article appears to describe noocracy as being based upon wisdom and consensus. That's actually a huge difference in implication and meaning. I'm not convinced I'm right about this but, if I am, the article needs clarity.
This article looks like it only has one source. It should probably have more for verification and such. The only source used here looks like it is used purely for the example/"publications" section. I thought I should bring that up. anamedperson ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 06:23, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
For Plato and "noocracy", there is no precise "quote" of the idea, because of the form of Plato's writings ( didactical philosophical dialogs ). Still, the idea is expressed in " The Republic", especially with the selection of the most able citizens in order to become the "guardians" of the city. So, although this article might have been created by a single person, it could be developped later with a broader approach. ( Sylvain, Paris, France) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.219.236.122 ( talk) 19:35, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
In this part, there should be a clearer statement about "by who" and "with which" arguments noocracy was criticised. It could be useful to analyse those arguments one by one, appropriately citing the resources from which they are drawn. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ardaboga ( talk • contribs) 21:38, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
Itzhak Rosenberg has repeatedly removed a bit of sourced content regarding a correlation between income and tolerance of LGBT rights, claiming that such tolerance is "offensive to an absolute majority of the world's population." Here is a place to put up facts in support of that claim. Just plain Bill ( talk) 18:19, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Athenidas,
Ardaboga. Peer reviewers:
My322.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 05:22, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
What would it be? Malick78 ( talk) 18:08, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
Nooc·ra·cy... Pronunciation: \ˈnō-ə-ˌkrə-sē\ 76.166.208.110 ( talk) 02:46, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
There must be a distinction made here - who used the actual terms, and who applied the concepts? Did Verdansky and Chardin ever use the word "noocracy". We need to be clear about who uses the actual term, and who uses the concept.
Along these lines, is there a philosophical tradition that bears direct continuity between the "noocracy" that Greek philosophers spoke of, and the modern philosophy, especially around the concept of noosphere? This is only vaguely stated, but it is not at all clear.
NittyG ( talk) 17:43, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
It's nessesesary to cite< where greek philosopher use this term -- 85.235.223.114 ( talk) 07:30, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
Surely the concept of a noosphere is contingent upon seeing human thought to be a totality, without distinction or qualitative judgement. An 'existential'. This article appears to describe noocracy as being based upon wisdom and consensus. That's actually a huge difference in implication and meaning. I'm not convinced I'm right about this but, if I am, the article needs clarity.
This article looks like it only has one source. It should probably have more for verification and such. The only source used here looks like it is used purely for the example/"publications" section. I thought I should bring that up. anamedperson ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 06:23, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
For Plato and "noocracy", there is no precise "quote" of the idea, because of the form of Plato's writings ( didactical philosophical dialogs ). Still, the idea is expressed in " The Republic", especially with the selection of the most able citizens in order to become the "guardians" of the city. So, although this article might have been created by a single person, it could be developped later with a broader approach. ( Sylvain, Paris, France) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.219.236.122 ( talk) 19:35, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
In this part, there should be a clearer statement about "by who" and "with which" arguments noocracy was criticised. It could be useful to analyse those arguments one by one, appropriately citing the resources from which they are drawn. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ardaboga ( talk • contribs) 21:38, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
Itzhak Rosenberg has repeatedly removed a bit of sourced content regarding a correlation between income and tolerance of LGBT rights, claiming that such tolerance is "offensive to an absolute majority of the world's population." Here is a place to put up facts in support of that claim. Just plain Bill ( talk) 18:19, 15 July 2020 (UTC)