This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Non-penetrative sex article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3 |
This
level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wikipedia is not censored. Images or details contained within this article may be graphic or otherwise objectionable to some readers, to ensure a quality article and complete coverage of its subject matter. For more information, please refer to Wikipedia's content disclaimer regarding potentially objectionable content and options for not seeing an image. |
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 1 September 2020 and 18 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Justacrow, Caitlinmacneill. Peer reviewers: Espy Neville.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 01:41, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 31 August 2020 and 18 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Mcox19. Peer reviewers: Liliapearljackson, Ig510.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 05:21, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
I cannot see photos Rajput joginder ( talk) 09:28, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
Although an increasing number of people misuses the word "masturbation" to describe manual stimulation of genitals regardless of who does it, the original meaning of "masturbation" clearly points out that it's a sexual act performed on oneself. Therefore, the term "mutual masturbation" is self-contradictory. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:A31A:E140:1E00:DDF9:816D:E0F2:E884 ( talk) 15:42, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Why did no one delete the painting of a monk having sex with a woman? I thought it would be considered offensive material in Wikipedia since there are a lot of Catholics in Wikipedia who would be shocked to see the painting, the monk is naked and having sex with a woman which is against Catholicism -- Eddiitt0 ( talk) 16:35, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
I posted this on 3 talk pages because I want to know why didn't Catholics delete images from the articles? I'm not Catholic myself but I thought maybe some Catholics would say that Wikipedia is misrepresenting Catholics and saying that monks love doggy style and like to masturbate, are you Catholic? -- Eddiitt0 ( talk) 17:34, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
41.114.161.184 ( talk) 23:20, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
I don’t feed her Matthew mom dad Jesse name 64.121.127.49 ( talk) 14:58, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
Hey, everyone! I would love to know if the new section "Manual sex" and its source are good enough for this article? I created this because most people understand "mutual masturbation" as either two partners watching each other stimulate their own genitals or simultaneously stimulating each other's genitals. Please let me know if I need to fix anything! Autisticeditor 20 ( talk) 23:48, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
Hello! I think Kunyaza should be mentioned under the Non-exclusively non-penetrative section, given kunyaza involves a non-penetrative and a penetrative phase in progression. This would open up conversation and help readers learn about other methods to reach full satisfaction. 108.46.18.172 ( talk) 18:28, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Non-penetrative sex article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3 |
This
level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wikipedia is not censored. Images or details contained within this article may be graphic or otherwise objectionable to some readers, to ensure a quality article and complete coverage of its subject matter. For more information, please refer to Wikipedia's content disclaimer regarding potentially objectionable content and options for not seeing an image. |
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 1 September 2020 and 18 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Justacrow, Caitlinmacneill. Peer reviewers: Espy Neville.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 01:41, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 31 August 2020 and 18 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Mcox19. Peer reviewers: Liliapearljackson, Ig510.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 05:21, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
I cannot see photos Rajput joginder ( talk) 09:28, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
Although an increasing number of people misuses the word "masturbation" to describe manual stimulation of genitals regardless of who does it, the original meaning of "masturbation" clearly points out that it's a sexual act performed on oneself. Therefore, the term "mutual masturbation" is self-contradictory. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:A31A:E140:1E00:DDF9:816D:E0F2:E884 ( talk) 15:42, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Why did no one delete the painting of a monk having sex with a woman? I thought it would be considered offensive material in Wikipedia since there are a lot of Catholics in Wikipedia who would be shocked to see the painting, the monk is naked and having sex with a woman which is against Catholicism -- Eddiitt0 ( talk) 16:35, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
I posted this on 3 talk pages because I want to know why didn't Catholics delete images from the articles? I'm not Catholic myself but I thought maybe some Catholics would say that Wikipedia is misrepresenting Catholics and saying that monks love doggy style and like to masturbate, are you Catholic? -- Eddiitt0 ( talk) 17:34, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
41.114.161.184 ( talk) 23:20, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
I don’t feed her Matthew mom dad Jesse name 64.121.127.49 ( talk) 14:58, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
Hey, everyone! I would love to know if the new section "Manual sex" and its source are good enough for this article? I created this because most people understand "mutual masturbation" as either two partners watching each other stimulate their own genitals or simultaneously stimulating each other's genitals. Please let me know if I need to fix anything! Autisticeditor 20 ( talk) 23:48, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
Hello! I think Kunyaza should be mentioned under the Non-exclusively non-penetrative section, given kunyaza involves a non-penetrative and a penetrative phase in progression. This would open up conversation and help readers learn about other methods to reach full satisfaction. 108.46.18.172 ( talk) 18:28, 6 October 2023 (UTC)