This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The title signal noise is not very appropriate, as it's not a standard term and is not even used in the article. The article is about noise, and the signal should be converted to an appropriate parenthetical. Maybe noise (signal) or noise (information theory). Any other good ideas before I pick a place to move it? Dicklyon 18:20, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
The term "signal noise" is unfamiliar to me as well. However, have you seen how many articles are listed on "what links here" ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Whatlinkshere/Signal_noise ) ? I think such a commonly-used phrase deserves its own article (unless it's merely a synonym for some other common term). If many people actually use the phrase "signal noise", and hardly anyone uses the synonym " noise (signal)", let's use the more-common name. ( Wikipedia:Naming conventions: "use the most common name").
What do the people who wrote the articles that use this term mean by "signal noise"? Since I can't tell any difference in meaning between the current text of the article and noise, I propose to merge them. I hope that either:
-- 68.0.120.35 12:59, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 10:03, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The title signal noise is not very appropriate, as it's not a standard term and is not even used in the article. The article is about noise, and the signal should be converted to an appropriate parenthetical. Maybe noise (signal) or noise (information theory). Any other good ideas before I pick a place to move it? Dicklyon 18:20, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
The term "signal noise" is unfamiliar to me as well. However, have you seen how many articles are listed on "what links here" ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Whatlinkshere/Signal_noise ) ? I think such a commonly-used phrase deserves its own article (unless it's merely a synonym for some other common term). If many people actually use the phrase "signal noise", and hardly anyone uses the synonym " noise (signal)", let's use the more-common name. ( Wikipedia:Naming conventions: "use the most common name").
What do the people who wrote the articles that use this term mean by "signal noise"? Since I can't tell any difference in meaning between the current text of the article and noise, I propose to merge them. I hope that either:
-- 68.0.120.35 12:59, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 10:03, 10 November 2007 (UTC)