![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because members of Noekk are from the band Empyrium, which has recently reformed. I myself was looking into Noekk because of the fact I enjoy Empyrium's music. Seems logical to keep something I found myself because of its relevance. — Drakkcoil ( talk) 16:38, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
This article has been redirected to a BLP-prodded article twice, with the redirecter stating that the article is a "parent" of said newly-created, soon-to-be-deleted article. This is useless practically, since he is redirecting it to an article that isn't likely to exist in a few days; it serves as a "pocket deletion" done without any discussion. Unilateral redirection, really, always does this, and I am reverting as a procedural measure to force this discussion. The article makes a credible assertion of notability per WP:MUSIC, and one person's opinion about the lack of sourcing is not sufficient to force removal-by-redirection of the article. If someone wants it deleted, he will have to take it to AfD. Chubbles ( talk) 20:30, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because members of Noekk are from the band Empyrium, which has recently reformed. I myself was looking into Noekk because of the fact I enjoy Empyrium's music. Seems logical to keep something I found myself because of its relevance. — Drakkcoil ( talk) 16:38, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
This article has been redirected to a BLP-prodded article twice, with the redirecter stating that the article is a "parent" of said newly-created, soon-to-be-deleted article. This is useless practically, since he is redirecting it to an article that isn't likely to exist in a few days; it serves as a "pocket deletion" done without any discussion. Unilateral redirection, really, always does this, and I am reverting as a procedural measure to force this discussion. The article makes a credible assertion of notability per WP:MUSIC, and one person's opinion about the lack of sourcing is not sufficient to force removal-by-redirection of the article. If someone wants it deleted, he will have to take it to AfD. Chubbles ( talk) 20:30, 4 December 2011 (UTC)