This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
WDGraham has proposed a merger of the articles, I'll start a section here for editors to speculate why, or for WDGraham to make the suggestion, if he'd like to. Penyulap talk 05:13, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
The other article which WD suggested should be merged, is not only the wrong subject for a merger, it's incorrectly named. Just because the name is similar doesn't mean an article should be merged WD.
The subject of the other article should remain, as it says in the intitial plans section of that article, before it got muddled, "The Universal Docking Module (UDM) (Russian: Универсальный стыковочный модуль)"
The Universal docking module (UDM) and the Node module (NM) are not the same subject, not even close. First and second and third pages after a fast google show the UDM.
I don't agree with WD and I don't agree with the editor who is calling himself Jeffsapko where he moved the page here.
The problem most likely stems from confusing the module with the mission. Just because you can plan on parking your families 3 cars at a house next door to the party, but then when you get closer to the date of the party you're told it's a different house where you can park your 3 cars at, doesn't make the new house the same as the old house. They are still different houses although they are similar in being able to accommodate 3 cars. The UDM was capable of docking a few different ships to the ROS that's true, and the NM now fills that mission, allowing many ships to dock. But they are not the same module, not even in the same class.
I suggest stop with the mergers and moving and start writing a bit more in the UDM article so both the casual reader as well as the next editor to read it has some idea of what it is about. The copying of the new information I put into the Node Module article when I made it, into the other article doesn't help. Penyulap ☏ 08:00, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
Since the objections seem to be on the grounds that the UM and UDM should have separate articles, I've boldly merged the articles and proposed a split of the UDM content to its own article. -- W. D. Graham 12:08, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: moved ( page mover nac) Flooded with them hundreds 16:11, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
Uzlovoy Module → Prichal (ISS module) – Actually, Uzlovoy Module is not a name, it is a description (nodal module). The name of this module is Prichal (Berth), which is used by numerous Russian sources. Maybe there are more appropriate variants (like Nodal module Prichal for example, as in ru.wikipedia.org), but the main point is to change the name from Uzlovoy to Prichal. Any comments and propositions are welcomed; pinging prior authors @ WDGraham, Penyulap, Monareal, Op47, Jarrod Baniqued, Nickst, and Calibrator:. Igor Krein ( talk) 08:56, 2 November 2018 (UTC) --Relisting. KCVelaga ( talk) 03:19, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
What is meant by that? -- Bernardoni ( talk) 00:45, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
WDGraham has proposed a merger of the articles, I'll start a section here for editors to speculate why, or for WDGraham to make the suggestion, if he'd like to. Penyulap talk 05:13, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
The other article which WD suggested should be merged, is not only the wrong subject for a merger, it's incorrectly named. Just because the name is similar doesn't mean an article should be merged WD.
The subject of the other article should remain, as it says in the intitial plans section of that article, before it got muddled, "The Universal Docking Module (UDM) (Russian: Универсальный стыковочный модуль)"
The Universal docking module (UDM) and the Node module (NM) are not the same subject, not even close. First and second and third pages after a fast google show the UDM.
I don't agree with WD and I don't agree with the editor who is calling himself Jeffsapko where he moved the page here.
The problem most likely stems from confusing the module with the mission. Just because you can plan on parking your families 3 cars at a house next door to the party, but then when you get closer to the date of the party you're told it's a different house where you can park your 3 cars at, doesn't make the new house the same as the old house. They are still different houses although they are similar in being able to accommodate 3 cars. The UDM was capable of docking a few different ships to the ROS that's true, and the NM now fills that mission, allowing many ships to dock. But they are not the same module, not even in the same class.
I suggest stop with the mergers and moving and start writing a bit more in the UDM article so both the casual reader as well as the next editor to read it has some idea of what it is about. The copying of the new information I put into the Node Module article when I made it, into the other article doesn't help. Penyulap ☏ 08:00, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
Since the objections seem to be on the grounds that the UM and UDM should have separate articles, I've boldly merged the articles and proposed a split of the UDM content to its own article. -- W. D. Graham 12:08, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: moved ( page mover nac) Flooded with them hundreds 16:11, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
Uzlovoy Module → Prichal (ISS module) – Actually, Uzlovoy Module is not a name, it is a description (nodal module). The name of this module is Prichal (Berth), which is used by numerous Russian sources. Maybe there are more appropriate variants (like Nodal module Prichal for example, as in ru.wikipedia.org), but the main point is to change the name from Uzlovoy to Prichal. Any comments and propositions are welcomed; pinging prior authors @ WDGraham, Penyulap, Monareal, Op47, Jarrod Baniqued, Nickst, and Calibrator:. Igor Krein ( talk) 08:56, 2 November 2018 (UTC) --Relisting. KCVelaga ( talk) 03:19, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
What is meant by that? -- Bernardoni ( talk) 00:45, 26 November 2021 (UTC)