![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Added viewpoints of liberal and secular historians to maintain NPOV, as well as features distinguishing the Islamic and Biblical accounts of Noah. -- Zeeshanhasan 20:44, 23 Jul 2004 (UTC)
i propose we merge this into "Noah" for the following reasons:
Any thoughts? Ungtss 16:00, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)
BE BOLD !! DO IT !! (I'd do it myself, but you'd probably do a better job) 4.250.198.63 16:40, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)
No! Noah and Nuh are best dealt with via two distinct articles. Merecat 08:09, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
In both verses of the Holy Qur'an that is used in the article, neither of them mention a '950' year period of preaching but rather is found in 29:14. -- WittyMan1986 ( talk) 04:27, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
What exactly is the purpose behind that section of the article??? Can someone add some text to clarify why it's there? Thanks. Aristophanes68 ( talk) 02:26, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
A template is prepared for prominent prophets .
Lineage of several prophets according to Islamic tradition |
---|
Dotted lines indicate multiple generations. |
This will help at a glance view link between them. Hope this is also of prime importance in this article. If there is no further suggestion on this, we may include this in this article. -- Md iet ( talk) 03:13, 4 January 2011 (UTC)-- Md iet ( talk) 09:13, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
The template improved further and included in this article as discussed on page Talk: Islamic view of Moses please.-- Md iet ( talk) 05:10, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
Islamic view of Noah → Nuh – The article i want to move to Nuh is Islamic view of Noah. As Islamic view of Noah depicting the Prophet Nuh in Islam so i believe the name of the page should also be depicting the way it is spelled and understood in Islam. While the Islamic view of Noah would be treated as a redirect to the page Nuh. As the Prophet "Nuh" is a prominent figure in Islam so i believe the primary topic should be Islamic view of Noah as it was earlier. Please provide your opinion regarding the move with justification whether positive or negative Ibrahim ebi ( talk) 04:16, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Islamic views on Abraham which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 20:13, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Abraham in Islam which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 14:58, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
There is suggestion that redirect move for this page to be discussed here only. If anybody have objection for creating a redirect for this page by ‘ Nuh’ the Islamic name of Prophet Noah, may please suggest further, as this is name by which prophet is known in Islam which has majority of English reader. -- Md iet ( talk) 12:16, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
I have changed the infobox as there is point of view in it and was more inclined towards how He is perceived in Christianity. Also the infobox i have used is similar to the one displayed at Abraham in Islam and Moses in Islam. -- Bestonewins ( talk) 06:20, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
the current text states that "there is little in the Qur'an to support" the view that "only certain parts of the world were submerged under water". However, the last statement is that "According to Islam...the flood was local, around the Dead Sea area..." This is an apparent contradiction which must be resolved by referencing extra-Qur'anic literature, popular interpretation, etc.
137.111.13.46 ( talk) 15:47, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
This is quite confusing. And part of this section is attributed to "Submitters International", a group that only themselves would accept as speaking for "Islam" as they are outside the fold according to the rest of Muslims.
dk4 ( talk) 03:37, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
I have written a book titled "Noah Compared Genesis and Quran" that will soon be online as an e-book by goldenaer.com. I have studied Islamic mysticism for 25 years including a 6 month residential intensive course with a Sufi Sheikh, and God has given we some insights, So I feel I can contribute a lot to this discussion. Kildwyke ( talk) 18:35, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
"Islamic scholars agree that Noah had four sons whose names were Ham, Shem, Yam and Japheth."
I removed because the Quran does not mention any of his sons and nor is there an agreement among Islamic scholars that those were their names. Not to mention the source used is "thetorah" which is not an Islamic, but a Jewish reference. Akmal94 ( talk) 09:24, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
Can someone please review the article and decide if the maintenance template could be removed? 2016-11-23 23:00 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.110.99.115 ( talk)
I want to know the answer 197.237.224.143 ( talk) 14:33, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
Urdu languages 2409:4052:E1F:CA6F:0:0:298B:B013 ( talk) 18:42, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Added viewpoints of liberal and secular historians to maintain NPOV, as well as features distinguishing the Islamic and Biblical accounts of Noah. -- Zeeshanhasan 20:44, 23 Jul 2004 (UTC)
i propose we merge this into "Noah" for the following reasons:
Any thoughts? Ungtss 16:00, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)
BE BOLD !! DO IT !! (I'd do it myself, but you'd probably do a better job) 4.250.198.63 16:40, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)
No! Noah and Nuh are best dealt with via two distinct articles. Merecat 08:09, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
In both verses of the Holy Qur'an that is used in the article, neither of them mention a '950' year period of preaching but rather is found in 29:14. -- WittyMan1986 ( talk) 04:27, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
What exactly is the purpose behind that section of the article??? Can someone add some text to clarify why it's there? Thanks. Aristophanes68 ( talk) 02:26, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
A template is prepared for prominent prophets .
Lineage of several prophets according to Islamic tradition |
---|
Dotted lines indicate multiple generations. |
This will help at a glance view link between them. Hope this is also of prime importance in this article. If there is no further suggestion on this, we may include this in this article. -- Md iet ( talk) 03:13, 4 January 2011 (UTC)-- Md iet ( talk) 09:13, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
The template improved further and included in this article as discussed on page Talk: Islamic view of Moses please.-- Md iet ( talk) 05:10, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
Islamic view of Noah → Nuh – The article i want to move to Nuh is Islamic view of Noah. As Islamic view of Noah depicting the Prophet Nuh in Islam so i believe the name of the page should also be depicting the way it is spelled and understood in Islam. While the Islamic view of Noah would be treated as a redirect to the page Nuh. As the Prophet "Nuh" is a prominent figure in Islam so i believe the primary topic should be Islamic view of Noah as it was earlier. Please provide your opinion regarding the move with justification whether positive or negative Ibrahim ebi ( talk) 04:16, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Islamic views on Abraham which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 20:13, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Abraham in Islam which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 14:58, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
There is suggestion that redirect move for this page to be discussed here only. If anybody have objection for creating a redirect for this page by ‘ Nuh’ the Islamic name of Prophet Noah, may please suggest further, as this is name by which prophet is known in Islam which has majority of English reader. -- Md iet ( talk) 12:16, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
I have changed the infobox as there is point of view in it and was more inclined towards how He is perceived in Christianity. Also the infobox i have used is similar to the one displayed at Abraham in Islam and Moses in Islam. -- Bestonewins ( talk) 06:20, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
the current text states that "there is little in the Qur'an to support" the view that "only certain parts of the world were submerged under water". However, the last statement is that "According to Islam...the flood was local, around the Dead Sea area..." This is an apparent contradiction which must be resolved by referencing extra-Qur'anic literature, popular interpretation, etc.
137.111.13.46 ( talk) 15:47, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
This is quite confusing. And part of this section is attributed to "Submitters International", a group that only themselves would accept as speaking for "Islam" as they are outside the fold according to the rest of Muslims.
dk4 ( talk) 03:37, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
I have written a book titled "Noah Compared Genesis and Quran" that will soon be online as an e-book by goldenaer.com. I have studied Islamic mysticism for 25 years including a 6 month residential intensive course with a Sufi Sheikh, and God has given we some insights, So I feel I can contribute a lot to this discussion. Kildwyke ( talk) 18:35, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
"Islamic scholars agree that Noah had four sons whose names were Ham, Shem, Yam and Japheth."
I removed because the Quran does not mention any of his sons and nor is there an agreement among Islamic scholars that those were their names. Not to mention the source used is "thetorah" which is not an Islamic, but a Jewish reference. Akmal94 ( talk) 09:24, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
Can someone please review the article and decide if the maintenance template could be removed? 2016-11-23 23:00 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.110.99.115 ( talk)
I want to know the answer 197.237.224.143 ( talk) 14:33, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
Urdu languages 2409:4052:E1F:CA6F:0:0:298B:B013 ( talk) 18:42, 11 January 2022 (UTC)